FEAC vs. EQL

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FEAC (Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF) and EQL (ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FEAC is actively managed, while EQL is passively managed. Over the past year, FEAC returned 25.23% vs 18.34% for EQL. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FEAC charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for EQL.

Performance

FEAC vs. EQL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAC achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly higher than EQL's 10.71% return.

FEAC

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 0.95%
• 6M: 10.99%
• YTD: 12.32%
• 1Y: 25.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.84%

EQL

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 6.82%
• YTD: 10.71%
• 1Y: 18.34%
• 3Y*: 14.59%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: 12.39%
• ALL TIME*: 13.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	$3.33M	$2.84M	$2.70M
FEAC Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF	$176.34K	$659.55K	$548.25K

FEAC vs. EQL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FEAC Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF	12.32%	18.01%	-1.87%
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	10.71%	13.09%	-3.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAC and EQL is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024	0.76

The correlation between FEAC and EQL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FEAC vs. EQL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEAC

FEAC Risk / Return Rank: 78
FEAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FEAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FEAC Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FEAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FEAC Martin Ratio Rank: 85

EQL

EQL Risk / Return Rank: 79
EQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
EQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
EQL Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EQL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEAC vs. EQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEAC	EQL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	1.82	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	2.54	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.33	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	2.78	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.82	10.89	+0.93

FEAC vs. EQL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the EQL Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAC and EQL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEAC vs. EQL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAC drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum EQL drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAC and EQL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEAC	EQL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.96%	-35.65%	+16.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.15%	-6.19%	-1.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.07%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.82%	-0.27%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.46%	-3.23%	+0.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	1.58%	+0.42%

Volatility

FEAC vs. EQL - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) at 2.23%. This indicates that FEAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEAC	EQL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.34%	2.23%	+1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.42%	7.03%	+3.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.49%	9.50%	+3.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.29%	14.51%	+2.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.29%	16.49%	+0.80%

FEAC vs. EQL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EQL's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FEAC vs. EQL - Dividend Comparison

FEAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than EQL's 1.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	1.35%	1.73%	1.78%	1.96%	2.14%	1.69%	2.29%	1.95%	2.39%	1.97%	2.89%	2.07%
FEAC Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF	0.77%	0.94%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEAC and EQL in my portfolio?

FEAC and EQL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEAC or EQL?

FEAC has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to EQL (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAC dropped -18.96% vs EQL's -35.65%.

Which ETF is better, FEAC or EQL?

On 1-year performance, FEAC leads with 25.23% vs 18.34% for EQL. On fees, FEAC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EQL has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEAC or EQL?

Over the 1-year period, FEAC has performed better with a 25.23% return vs 18.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEAC or EQL?

FEAC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for EQL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEAC or EQL?

EQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.77% for FEAC.

What is the main difference between FEAC and EQL?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FEAC and 0.27% for EQL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.