FEAAX vs. MATFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FEAAX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A) and MATFX (Matthews Asia Innovators Fund) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FEAAX returned 16.10%/yr vs 16.28%/yr for MATFX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEAAX charges 1.20%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for MATFX.

Performance

FEAAX vs. MATFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) and Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAAX achieves a 40.03% return, which is significantly lower than MATFX's 64.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FEAAX having a 16.10% annualized return and MATFX not far ahead at 16.28%.

FEAAX

• 1D: 1.89%
• 1M: 12.51%
• YTD: 40.03%
• 6M: 45.31%
• 1Y: 75.61%
• 3Y*: 34.98%
• 5Y*: 8.62%
• 10Y*: 16.10%

MATFX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 16.96%
• YTD: 64.51%
• 6M: 66.89%
• 1Y: 101.02%
• 3Y*: 35.59%
• 5Y*: 11.22%
• 10Y*: 16.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAAX vs. MATFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A	40.03%	36.67%	20.63%	13.50%	-30.79%	-15.06%	72.51%	30.64%	-15.11%	45.96%
MATFX Matthews Asia Innovators Fund	64.51%	30.22%	16.47%	-1.77%	-24.66%	-5.90%	86.75%	29.60%	-18.59%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAAX and MATFX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 1999	0.86

The correlation between FEAAX and MATFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FEAAX vs. MATFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAAX

FEAAX Risk / Return Rank: 94
FEAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FEAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FEAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FEAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FEAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

MATFX

MATFX Risk / Return Rank: 97
MATFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MATFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
MATFX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MATFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
MATFX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAAX vs. MATFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) and Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEAAX	MATFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.86	4.68	-0.81
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.58	5.50	-0.92
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.68	1.80	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.64	9.33	-3.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.46	26.06	-5.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEAAX vs. MATFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.86, which is comparable to the MATFX Sharpe Ratio of 4.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAAX and MATFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEAAX	MATFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.86	4.68	-0.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.46	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	0.72	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.33	+0.07

Drawdowns

FEAAX vs. MATFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAAX drawdown since its inception was -60.87%, smaller than the maximum MATFX drawdown of -76.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAAX and MATFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEAAX	MATFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.87%	-76.88%	+16.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.56%	-11.33%	-2.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.33%	-18.19%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.46%	-45.33%	-8.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.90%	-52.42%	-5.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.43%	+0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.20%	-28.17%	+7.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.73%	3.99%	-0.26%

Volatility

FEAAX vs. MATFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) is 8.57%, while Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) has a volatility of 10.46%. This indicates that FEAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MATFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEAAX	MATFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.57%	10.46%	-1.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.67%	19.23%	-2.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.82%	22.62%	-2.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.91%	24.50%	-1.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.97%	22.64%	-1.67%

FEAAX vs. MATFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MATFX's 1.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEAAX vs. MATFX - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEAAX nor MATFX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	12.88%	6.62%	5.21%	6.49%	0.03%	1.10%	0.84%
MATFX Matthews Asia Innovators Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	26.54%	31.07%	1.67%	0.29%	2.63%	8.44%	0.00%	15.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEAAX and MATFX in my portfolio?

FEAAX and MATFX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEAAX or MATFX?

MATFX has higher volatility (10.46%) compared to FEAAX (8.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAAX dropped -60.87% vs MATFX's -76.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MATFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.68 vs 3.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.