FEAAX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FEAAX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FEAAX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FEAAX returned 15.97%/yr vs 22.05%/yr for FBGRX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEAAX charges 1.20%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

FEAAX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAAX achieves a 35.64% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's 13.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FEAAX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 15.97%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.05% annualized return.

FEAAX

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 35.64%
• 6M: 37.05%
• 1Y: 59.58%
• 3Y*: 33.63%
• 5Y*: 7.11%
• 10Y*: 15.97%

FBGRX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -1.08%
• YTD: 13.72%
• 6M: 12.28%
• 1Y: 34.13%
• 3Y*: 29.67%
• 5Y*: 14.54%
• 10Y*: 22.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAAX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A	35.64%	36.67%	20.63%	13.50%	-30.79%	-15.06%	72.51%	30.64%	-15.11%	45.96%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	13.72%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	1.02%	36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAAX and FBGRX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 1994	0.48

The correlation between FEAAX and FBGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FEAAX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAAX

FEAAX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FEAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FEAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FEAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FEAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FEAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 58
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAAX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEAAX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	1.84	+0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	2.45	+0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.32	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.46	2.76	+1.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.17	11.26	+3.91

FEAAX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAAX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEAAX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAAX drawdown since its inception was -60.87%, roughly equal to the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAAX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEAAX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.87%	-58.64%	-2.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.56%	-12.65%	-0.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.33%	-27.07%	+9.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.46%	-43.08%	-10.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.90%	-43.08%	-14.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.09%	-4.81%	+0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.17%	-12.51%	-7.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.98%	3.09%	+0.89%

Volatility

FEAAX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) has a higher volatility of 13.99% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 8.47%. This indicates that FEAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEAAX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.99%	8.47%	+5.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.88%	14.84%	+6.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.29%	19.00%	+4.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.55%	25.11%	-1.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.28%	23.77%	-2.49%

FEAAX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEAAX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FEAAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.67%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	12.88%	6.62%	5.21%	6.49%	0.03%	1.10%	0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEAAX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

FEAAX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEAAX or FBGRX?

FEAAX has higher volatility (13.99%) compared to FBGRX (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAAX dropped -60.87% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.