PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDVV vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDVV vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDVV achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return.


FDVV

1D
-1.12%
1M
4.44%
YTD
8.39%
6M
8.67%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
20.08%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*

VTI

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.99%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.09%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDVV vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
8.39%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%2.80%24.07%-1.26%14.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.20%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FDVV and VTI is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.88

The correlation between FDVV and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDVV vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDVV
VTI

Technology

29.1%
33.5%

Financial Services

17.0%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

11.0%
4.7%

Real Estate

10.1%
2.4%

Utilities

8.7%
2.3%

Communication Services

3.7%
10.3%

Industrials

3.4%
9.8%

Healthcare

3.1%
9.2%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Energy

-

3.7%

Technology

FDVV
29.1%
VTI
33.5%

Financial Services

FDVV
17.0%
VTI
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FDVV
13.6%
VTI
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

FDVV
11.0%
VTI
4.7%

Real Estate

FDVV
10.1%
VTI
2.4%

Utilities

FDVV
8.7%
VTI
2.3%

Communication Services

FDVV
3.7%
VTI
10.3%

Industrials

FDVV
3.4%
VTI
9.8%

Healthcare

FDVV
3.1%
VTI
9.2%

Basic Materials

FDVV

-

VTI
2.0%

Energy

FDVV

-

VTI
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDVV vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDVV vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDVVVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.42

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

3.17

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.54

14.62

-4.09

FDVV vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDVV and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDVVVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.33

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.73

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.51

+0.29

Drawdowns

FDVV vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDVV drawdown since its inception was -40.25%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVV and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDVVVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.25%

-55.45%

+15.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-8.92%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.90%

-19.30%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.18%

-25.36%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-0.72%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-8.03%

+4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

1.93%

+0.30%

Volatility

FDVV vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.96%. This indicates that FDVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDVVVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

2.96%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.99%

9.13%

-1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.06%

12.17%

-2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

17.40%

-2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.00%

18.30%

-1.30%

FDVV vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDVV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDVV vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.72%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDVV and VTI have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDVV has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to VTI (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVV dropped -40.25% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.36% vs 12.69% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 12.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDVV.

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.

FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDVV and 0.03% for VTI.

FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDVV and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer