FDVV vs. COWZ

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDVV returned 13.25%/yr vs 10.11%/yr for COWZ. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDVV charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.

Performance

FDVV vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDVV achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 6.41% return.

FDVV

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 1.68%
• YTD: 7.59%
• 6M: 7.85%
• 1Y: 22.32%
• 3Y*: 19.56%
• 5Y*: 13.25%
• 10Y*: —

COWZ

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 6.41%
• 6M: 7.19%
• 1Y: 19.32%
• 3Y*: 13.26%
• 5Y*: 10.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDVV vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	7.59%	17.08%	21.81%	18.00%	-4.21%	29.24%	2.80%	24.07%	-1.26%	14.00%
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	6.41%	8.98%	10.64%	14.73%	0.19%	42.57%	11.65%	23.41%	-10.05%	20.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FDVV and COWZ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016	0.84

The correlation between FDVV and COWZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDVV vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDVV	COWZ
Technology	29.1%	16.0%
Financial Services	17.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	13.6%	11.7%
Consumer Defensive	11.0%	10.9%
Real Estate	10.1%	-
Utilities	8.7%	-
Communication Services	3.7%	10.4%
Industrials	3.4%	8.4%
Healthcare	3.1%	21.8%
Basic Materials	-	3.7%
Energy	-	16.9%

Return for Risk

FDVV vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDVV

FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 69
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 61

COWZ

COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 64
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDVV vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDVV	COWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	1.74	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	2.58	+0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.31	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	3.88	-1.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.00	10.52	-0.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDVV vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDVV and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDVV	COWZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	1.74	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	0.58	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.64	+0.15

Drawdowns

FDVV vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDVV drawdown since its inception was -40.25%, roughly equal to the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVV and COWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDVV	COWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.25%	-38.63%	-1.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.30%	-5.00%	-4.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.90%	-22.00%	+6.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.18%	-22.00%	+1.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.85%	-2.53%	+0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.80%	-4.80%	+1.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	1.84%	+0.40%

Volatility

FDVV vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) have volatilities of 2.96% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDVV	COWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.96%	2.92%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.08%	7.21%	+0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.07%	11.16%	-1.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.75%	17.64%	-2.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.99%	19.92%	-2.93%

FDVV vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDVV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDVV vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than COWZ's 1.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	1.94%	2.19%	1.82%	1.92%	1.96%	1.48%	2.54%	1.96%	1.67%	1.95%	0.13%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	2.74%	2.89%	2.94%	3.77%	3.44%	2.70%	3.19%	3.93%	4.05%	3.66%	1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDVV and COWZ in my portfolio?

FDVV and COWZ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDVV or COWZ?

FDVV has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to COWZ (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVV dropped -40.25% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

Which ETF is better, FDVV or COWZ?

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.25% vs 10.11% for COWZ. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDVV or COWZ?

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.25% return vs 10.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDVV or COWZ?

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COWZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDVV or COWZ?

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 1.94% for COWZ.

What is the main difference between FDVV and COWZ?

FDVV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDVV and 0.49% for COWZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.