FDV vs. DTD
FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) and DTD (WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. FDV is actively managed, while DTD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDV returned 14.78%/yr vs 16.97%/yr for DTD. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DTD.
Performance
FDV vs. DTD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDV achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly higher than DTD's 10.23% return.
FDV
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 11.86%
- 1Y
- 19.49%
- 3Y*
- 14.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DTD
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 6M
- 10.55%
- 1Y
- 22.12%
- 3Y*
- 16.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
FDV vs. DTD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 11.72% | 11.01% | 14.41% | -2.16% | 1.35% |
DTD WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund | 10.23% | 14.25% | 18.56% | 10.63% | -1.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDV and DTD is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2022 | 0.82 |
The correlation between FDV and DTD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDV vs. DTD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDV
DTD
Financial Services
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
FDV
DTD
Utilities
FDV
DTD
Healthcare
FDV
DTD
Consumer Defensive
FDV
DTD
Technology
FDV
DTD
Real Estate
FDV
DTD
Energy
FDV
DTD
Consumer Cyclical
FDV
DTD
Industrials
FDV
DTD
Communication Services
FDV
DTD
Basic Materials
FDV
DTD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDV vs. DTD — Risk / Return Rank
FDV
DTD
FDV vs. DTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDV | DTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.43 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 3.54 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.05 | 14.62 | -2.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDV vs. DTD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDV drawdown since its inception was -16.70%, smaller than the maximum DTD drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDV and DTD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDV | DTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.70% | -58.19% | +41.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.70% | -6.30% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.55% | -14.41% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -1.07% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.92% | -7.33% | +3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 1.52% | +0.27% |
Volatility
FDV vs. DTD - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) have volatilities of 2.82% and 2.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDV | DTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 2.71% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.82% | 7.13% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 9.41% | +1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 13.58% | -0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 16.22% | -3.57% |
FDV vs. DTD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DTD's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDV vs. DTD - Dividend Comparison
FDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than DTD's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTD WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund | 1.87% | 1.99% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 2.62% | 2.04% | 2.73% | 2.50% | 2.93% | 2.36% | 2.66% | 2.81% |
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 2.56% | 3.11% | 3.12% | 3.54% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDV and DTD have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDV has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to DTD (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDV dropped -16.70% vs DTD's -58.19%.
On 3-year performance, DTD leads with 16.97% vs 14.78% for FDV. On fees, DTD is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DTD has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DTD has performed better with a 16.97% return vs 14.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DTD is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDV.
FDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 1.87% for DTD.
They also come from different issuers: Federated and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDV and 0.28% for DTD.
DTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDV and DTD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer