FDV vs. DIVO
FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) and DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Federated, while DIVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDV returned 14.78%/yr vs 15.35%/yr for DIVO. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for DIVO.
Performance
FDV vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDV achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly higher than DIVO's 5.53% return.
FDV
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 19.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIVO
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 5.53%
- 6M
- 5.82%
- 1Y
- 18.37%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.61%
- 10Y*
- —
FDV vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 11.72% | 11.01% | 14.41% | -2.16% | 1.92% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 5.53% | 17.40% | 16.22% | 6.95% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDV and DIVO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2022 | 0.74 |
The correlation between FDV and DIVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDV vs. DIVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDV
DIVO
Utilities
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Energy
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
FDV
DIVO
Financial Services
FDV
DIVO
Healthcare
FDV
DIVO
Consumer Defensive
FDV
DIVO
Technology
FDV
DIVO
Energy
FDV
DIVO
Real Estate
FDV
DIVO
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDV
DIVO
Industrials
FDV
DIVO
Communication Services
FDV
DIVO
Basic Materials
FDV
DIVO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDV vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank
FDV
DIVO
FDV vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDV | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 3.10 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.05 | 11.21 | +0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDV | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 2.06 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.85 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
FDV vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDV drawdown since its inception was -16.70%, smaller than the maximum DIVO drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDV and DIVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDV | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.70% | -30.04% | +13.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.70% | -5.95% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.55% | -12.12% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.82% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -2.61% | -1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 1.64% | +0.15% |
Volatility
FDV vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 2.01%. This indicates that FDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDV | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 2.01% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.82% | 6.88% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 8.97% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 11.94% | +0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 14.84% | -2.19% |
FDV vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDV vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison
FDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than DIVO's 6.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.42% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% |
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 2.56% | 3.11% | 3.12% | 3.54% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDV and DIVO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDV has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to DIVO (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDV dropped -16.70% vs DIVO's -30.04%.
On 3-year performance, DIVO leads with 15.35% vs 14.78% for FDV. On fees, FDV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 14.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for DIVO.
DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 2.56% for FDV.
FDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Federated and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDV and 0.56% for DIVO.
DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDV and DIVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer