FDTX vs. UGA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FDTX (Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - FDTX is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. FDTX is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Over the past year, FDTX returned 58.85% vs 79.48% for UGA. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. FDTX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.

Performance

FDTX vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTX achieves a 41.92% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.69% return.

FDTX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 20.99%
• YTD: 41.92%
• 6M: 41.67%
• 1Y: 58.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UGA

• 1D: -2.73%
• 1M: -12.25%
• YTD: 70.69%
• 6M: 59.72%
• 1Y: 79.48%
• 3Y*: 20.80%
• 5Y*: 24.41%
• 10Y*: 14.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTX vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FDTX Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF	41.92%	15.25%	23.99%	11.73%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	70.69%	-2.00%	3.77%	2.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FDTX and UGA is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2023	-0.02

The correlation between FDTX and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FDTX vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTX

FDTX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

UGA

UGA Risk / Return Rank: 70
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 62
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTX vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDTX	UGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	2.27	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	2.71	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.37	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.05	5.37	-2.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.66	12.86	-3.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDTX vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTX and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDTX	UGA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	2.27	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.25	0.12	+1.13

Drawdowns

FDTX vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTX drawdown since its inception was -27.23%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTX and UGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDTX	UGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.23%	-86.59%	+59.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.38%	-14.88%	-4.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.68%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.11%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.88%	-14.75%	+13.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.51%	-36.76%	+31.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.11%	6.20%	-0.09%

Volatility

FDTX vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX) is 8.56%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that FDTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDTX	UGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.56%	11.64%	-3.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.47%	30.48%	-11.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.45%	35.27%	-10.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.50%	34.40%	-8.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.50%	37.27%	-11.77%

FDTX vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDTX vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

Neither FDTX nor UGA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDTX and UGA in my portfolio?

FDTX and UGA have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDTX or UGA?

UGA has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to FDTX (8.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTX dropped -27.23% vs UGA's -86.59%.

Which ETF is better, FDTX or UGA?

On 1-year performance, UGA leads with 79.48% vs 58.85% for FDTX. On fees, FDTX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FDTX has been the lower-risk option at 8.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDTX or UGA?

Over the 1-year period, UGA has performed better with a 79.48% return vs 58.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDTX or UGA?

FDTX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDTX or UGA?

FDTX and UGA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FDTX and UGA?

FDTX is categorized as Technology Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDTX and 0.75% for UGA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.