FDTS vs. DXIV
FDTS (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund) and DXIV (Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. FDTS is passively managed, while DXIV is actively managed. Over the past year, FDTS returned 45.71% vs 29.75% for DXIV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDTS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for DXIV.
Performance
FDTS vs. DXIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDTS achieves a 16.64% return, which is significantly higher than DXIV's 10.82% return.
FDTS
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 16.64%
- 6M
- 19.06%
- 1Y
- 45.71%
- 3Y*
- 25.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.59%
- 10Y*
- 10.50%
DXIV
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 14.26%
- 1Y
- 29.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDTS vs. DXIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FDTS First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund | 16.64% | 51.17% | -3.69% |
DXIV Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF | 10.82% | 39.12% | -4.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDTS and DXIV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2024 | 0.82 |
The correlation between FDTS and DXIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDTS vs. DXIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDTS
DXIV
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
FDTS
DXIV
Consumer Cyclical
FDTS
DXIV
Technology
FDTS
DXIV
Financial Services
FDTS
DXIV
Basic Materials
FDTS
DXIV
Consumer Defensive
FDTS
DXIV
Real Estate
FDTS
DXIV
Energy
FDTS
DXIV
Healthcare
FDTS
DXIV
Communication Services
FDTS
DXIV
Utilities
FDTS
DXIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDTS vs. DXIV — Risk / Return Rank
FDTS
DXIV
FDTS vs. DXIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF (DXIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDTS | DXIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.40 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 2.76 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.32 | 10.91 | +2.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDTS | DXIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 2.22 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 1.66 | -1.29 |
Drawdowns
FDTS vs. DXIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDTS drawdown since its inception was -51.26%, which is greater than DXIV's maximum drawdown of -13.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTS and DXIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDTS | DXIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.26% | -13.71% | -37.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.61% | -10.84% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.49% | -1.35% | -5.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.65% | -2.47% | -8.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 2.73% | +0.71% |
Volatility
FDTS vs. DXIV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF (DXIV) at 3.89%. This indicates that FDTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDTS | DXIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 3.89% | +2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.09% | 11.08% | +3.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.05% | 13.50% | +3.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.28% | 15.39% | +13.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.85% | 15.39% | +9.46% |
FDTS vs. DXIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDTS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DXIV's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDTS vs. DXIV - Dividend Comparison
FDTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than DXIV's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXIV Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF | 2.29% | 2.50% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDTS First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund | 2.58% | 2.94% | 3.94% | 2.90% | 3.71% | 3.01% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 1.96% | 2.08% | 1.78% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDTS and DXIV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDTS has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to DXIV (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTS dropped -51.26% vs DXIV's -13.71%.
On 1-year performance, FDTS leads with 45.71% vs 29.75% for DXIV. On fees, DXIV is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DXIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FDTS has performed better with a 45.71% return vs 29.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DXIV is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDTS.
FDTS has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 2.29% for DXIV.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Dimensional Fund Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDTS and 0.30% for DXIV.
FDTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDTS and DXIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer