PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDTS vs. DLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDTS vs. DLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTS achieves a 16.64% return, which is significantly higher than DLS's 6.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FDTS has outperformed DLS with an annualized return of 10.50%, while DLS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.46% annualized return.


FDTS

1D
-1.14%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
16.64%
6M
19.06%
1Y
45.71%
3Y*
25.36%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
10.50%

DLS

1D
-0.94%
1M
0.80%
YTD
6.63%
6M
9.37%
1Y
22.56%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
7.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTS vs. DLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
16.64%51.17%2.44%10.96%-15.34%11.79%12.90%18.71%-23.71%36.01%
DLS
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend
6.63%34.11%3.06%15.33%-17.31%11.71%-1.28%22.20%-18.95%31.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FDTS and DLS is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2012

0.57

Over the past year, FDTS and DLS have become more correlated (0.85) than their long-term average of 0.57, meaning their price movements have been converging.

FDTS vs. DLS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDTS
DLS

Industrials

23.0%
27.8%

Consumer Cyclical

18.4%
12.8%

Technology

13.4%
8.4%

Financial Services

11.7%
13.3%

Basic Materials

11.2%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
7.9%

Real Estate

4.3%
7.8%

Energy

4.3%
3.0%

Healthcare

3.0%
3.7%

Communication Services

3.0%
4.4%

Utilities

2.7%
2.1%

Industrials

FDTS
23.0%
DLS
27.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FDTS
18.4%
DLS
12.8%

Technology

FDTS
13.4%
DLS
8.4%

Financial Services

FDTS
11.7%
DLS
13.3%

Basic Materials

FDTS
11.2%
DLS
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

FDTS
5.0%
DLS
7.9%

Real Estate

FDTS
4.3%
DLS
7.8%

Energy

FDTS
4.3%
DLS
3.0%

Healthcare

FDTS
3.0%
DLS
3.7%

Communication Services

FDTS
3.0%
DLS
4.4%

Utilities

FDTS
2.7%
DLS
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDTS vs. DLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTS
FDTS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FDTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

DLS
DLS Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTS vs. DLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDTSDLSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.69

1.69

+1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.52

2.41

+1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.31

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

2.05

+1.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.32

7.55

+5.77

FDTS vs. DLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTS Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the DLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTS and DLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDTSDLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

1.69

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.42

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.45

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.33

+0.04

Drawdowns

FDTS vs. DLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTS drawdown since its inception was -51.26%, smaller than the maximum DLS drawdown of -63.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTS and DLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTSDLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.26%

-63.13%

+11.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.61%

-11.04%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.19%

-12.69%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.11%

-32.22%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.26%

-44.77%

-6.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.49%

-3.20%

-3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.65%

-13.65%

+3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

2.99%

+0.45%

Volatility

FDTS vs. DLS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS) at 4.58%. This indicates that FDTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDTSDLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

4.58%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.09%

10.98%

+3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.05%

13.44%

+3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.28%

15.57%

+13.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.85%

16.67%

+8.18%

FDTS vs. DLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DLS's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDTS vs. DLS - Dividend Comparison

FDTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than DLS's 3.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLS
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend
3.50%3.87%4.56%4.29%4.96%3.29%2.50%3.37%3.66%2.79%3.29%2.72%
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
2.58%2.94%3.94%2.90%3.71%3.01%2.02%2.30%1.96%2.08%1.78%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDTS and DLS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDTS has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to DLS (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTS dropped -51.26% vs DLS's -63.13%.

On 10-year performance, FDTS leads with 10.50% vs 7.46% for DLS. On fees, DLS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, DLS has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDTS has performed better with a 10.50% return vs 7.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DLS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDTS.

DLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 2.58% for FDTS.

FDTS tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Small Cap Index, while DLS tracks WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDTS and 0.58% for DLS.

FDTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDTS and DLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer