FDTS vs. ASCI
FDTS (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund) and ASCI (abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. FDTS is passively managed, while ASCI is actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDTS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ASCI.
Performance
FDTS vs. ASCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDTS achieves a 16.64% return, which is significantly higher than ASCI's 7.39% return.
FDTS
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 16.64%
- 6M
- 19.06%
- 1Y
- 45.71%
- 3Y*
- 25.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.59%
- 10Y*
- 10.50%
ASCI
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDTS vs. ASCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDTS First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund | 16.64% | 5.37% |
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 7.39% | 1.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDTS and ASCI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDTS vs. ASCI — Risk / Return Rank
FDTS
ASCI
FDTS vs. ASCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF (ASCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDTS | ASCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.69 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.52 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.32 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDTS | ASCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.77 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
FDTS vs. ASCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDTS drawdown since its inception was -51.26%, which is greater than ASCI's maximum drawdown of -11.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTS and ASCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDTS | ASCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.26% | -11.22% | -40.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.49% | -2.85% | -3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.65% | -2.39% | -8.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | — | — |
Volatility
FDTS vs. ASCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDTS | ASCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.05% | 18.68% | -1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.28% | 18.68% | +10.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.85% | 18.68% | +6.17% |
FDTS vs. ASCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDTS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than ASCI's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDTS vs. ASCI - Dividend Comparison
FDTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than ASCI's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 0.75% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDTS First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund | 2.58% | 2.94% | 3.94% | 2.90% | 3.71% | 3.01% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 1.96% | 2.08% | 1.78% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDTS and ASCI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASCI is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASCI is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDTS.
FDTS has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 0.75% for ASCI.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDTS and 0.70% for ASCI.
Find the right allocation for FDTS and ASCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer