PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDTOX vs. FCGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDTOX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Class A (FDTOX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTOX achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's 15.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FDTOX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 15.06%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.21% annualized return.


FDTOX

1D
2.04%
1M
-1.94%
6M
7.18%
YTD
10.25%
1Y
19.91%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
12.13%
10Y*
15.06%
ALL TIME*
8.41%

FCGSX

1D
2.90%
1M
-4.42%
6M
12.80%
YTD
15.70%
1Y
35.19%
3Y*
28.42%
5Y*
16.31%
10Y*
23.21%
ALL TIME*
20.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FDTOX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDTOX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Class A
10.25%13.68%27.66%27.89%-20.14%27.77%27.02%27.81%-5.95%17.73%
FCGSX
Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund
15.70%25.52%38.00%45.97%-32.15%25.13%70.01%39.75%-4.03%37.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FDTOX and FCGSX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2013

0.90

The correlation between FDTOX and FCGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDTOX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDTOX
FDTOX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FDTOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTOX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FCGSX
FCGSX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FCGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FCGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDTOX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Class A (FDTOX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDTOXFCGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.28

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

3.15

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.25

11.58

-4.32

FDTOX vs. FCGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the FCGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTOX and FCGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDTOX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTOX drawdown since its inception was -72.07%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTOX and FCGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTOXFCGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.07%

-38.77%

-33.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.04%

-10.42%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.38%

-26.07%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.38%

-38.77%

+11.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.39%

-38.77%

+8.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.01%

-7.07%

+3.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.44%

-6.92%

-12.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

2.83%

-0.33%

Volatility

FDTOX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Class A (FDTOX) is 4.60%, while Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that FDTOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDTOXFCGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

6.27%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.04%

15.91%

-2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

19.98%

-3.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.97%

24.00%

-4.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.61%

23.37%

-3.76%

FDTOX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTOX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDTOX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison

FDTOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.01%, less than FCGSX's 9.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCGSX
Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund
9.06%10.48%12.49%3.13%0.61%38.65%31.99%11.06%13.21%10.51%2.44%0.25%
FDTOX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Class A
6.01%6.62%14.36%3.39%9.03%17.16%5.14%2.99%13.50%7.81%1.38%8.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FDTOX and FCGSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCGSX has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to FDTOX (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTOX dropped -72.07% vs FCGSX's -38.77%.

FCGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDTOX and FCGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer