PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDRX vs. XDSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDRX vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF (FDRX) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FDRX

1D
-5.24%
1M
15.26%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDSQ

1D
0.04%
1M
1.36%
YTD
2.84%
6M
3.73%
1Y
16.08%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
9.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRX vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FDRX and XDSQ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2026

0.67

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDRX vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDRX

XDSQ
XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRX vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF (FDRX) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FDRX vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDRXXDSQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

0.69

-0.88

Drawdowns

FDRX vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRX drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRX and XDSQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDRXXDSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.44%

-26.06%

-12.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.21%

0.00%

-8.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.93%

-4.96%

-13.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

Volatility

FDRX vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDRXXDSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.92%

10.54%

+47.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.92%

15.27%

+42.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.92%

15.09%

+42.83%

FDRX vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDRX vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither FDRX nor XDSQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FDRX and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for FDRX.

FDRX and XDSQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Corgi Strategies and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for FDRX and 0.79% for XDSQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDRX and XDSQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer