FDRX vs. QTJL
FDRX (Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FDRX is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDRX charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
FDRX vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FDRX
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- -10.12%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- 18.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDRX vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FDRX Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF | -22.73% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 6.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDRX and QTJL is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDRX vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
FDRX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTJL
FDRX vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF (FDRX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDRX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.78 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.63 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDRX vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRX drawdown since its inception was -39.78%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRX and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDRX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.78% | -33.40% | -6.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.21% | -0.03% | -24.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.04% | -7.84% | -12.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.27% | — |
Volatility
FDRX vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDRX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.70% | 9.86% | +48.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.70% | 20.30% | +38.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.70% | 20.30% | +38.40% |
FDRX vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDRX vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither FDRX nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FDRX and QTJL have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for FDRX.
FDRX and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Corgi Strategies and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for FDRX and 0.79% for QTJL.
Find the right allocation for FDRX and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer