FDRX vs. LINT
FDRX (Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FDRX is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDRX charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.
Performance
FDRX vs. LINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FDRX
- 1D
- -5.24%
- 1M
- 15.26%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LINT
- 1D
- 9.00%
- 1M
- 30.35%
- YTD
- 562.84%
- 6M
- 362.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDRX vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FDRX Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF | -4.32% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 300.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDRX and LINT is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2026 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDRX vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF (FDRX) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDRX | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.19 | 24.05 | -24.24 |
Drawdowns
FDRX vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRX drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, smaller than the maximum LINT drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRX and LINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDRX | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.44% | -49.54% | +11.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.21% | -26.55% | +18.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.93% | -20.51% | +1.58% |
Volatility
FDRX vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDRX | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.92% | 163.04% | -105.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.92% | 163.04% | -105.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.92% | 163.04% | -105.12% |
FDRX vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDRX vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison
FDRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FDRX Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.13% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDRX and LINT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for FDRX.
LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for FDRX.
They also come from different issuers: Corgi Strategies and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for FDRX and 0.97% for LINT.
Find the right allocation for FDRX and LINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer