PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDRX vs. COTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDRX vs. COTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF (FDRX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FDRX

1D
-5.24%
1M
15.26%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COTG

1D
1.39%
1M
-11.21%
YTD
17.32%
6M
1.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRX vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FDRX and COTG is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2026

-0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDRX vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF (FDRX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FDRX vs. COTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDRXCOTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

-0.28

+0.09

Drawdowns

FDRX vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRX drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRX and COTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDRXCOTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.44%

-25.69%

-12.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.21%

-23.48%

+15.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.93%

-8.35%

-10.58%

Volatility

FDRX vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDRXCOTGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.92%

40.65%

+17.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.92%

40.65%

+17.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.92%

40.65%

+17.27%

FDRX vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDRX vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison

Neither FDRX nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FDRX and COTG have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for FDRX.

FDRX and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Corgi Strategies and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for FDRX and 0.75% for COTG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDRX and COTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer