FDRX vs. ASMG
FDRX (Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF) and ASMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FDRX is passively managed, while ASMG is actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDRX charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ASMG.
Performance
FDRX vs. ASMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FDRX
- 1D
- -4.23%
- 1M
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -15.44%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASMG
- 1D
- -4.38%
- 1M
- -6.55%
- 6M
- 50.06%
- YTD
- 126.91%
- 1Y
- 310.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDRX vs. ASMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FDRX Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF | -17.29% |
ASMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF | 65.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDRX and ASMG is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDRX vs. ASMG — Risk / Return Rank
FDRX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ASMG
FDRX vs. ASMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF (FDRX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDRX | ASMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 9.06 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 26.10 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDRX vs. ASMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRX drawdown since its inception was -39.78%, smaller than the maximum ASMG drawdown of -43.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRX and ASMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDRX | ASMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.78% | -43.95% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -34.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.87% | -21.39% | +2.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.83% | -13.09% | -6.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.11% | — |
Volatility
FDRX vs. ASMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDRX | ASMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 37.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 73.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.14% | 91.70% | -33.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.14% | 89.23% | -31.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.14% | 89.23% | -31.09% |
FDRX vs. ASMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDRX vs. ASMG - Dividend Comparison
FDRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ASMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF | 4.94% | 11.20% |
FDRX Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDRX and ASMG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for FDRX.
ASMG has the higher dividend yield at 4.94%, compared with 0.00% for FDRX.
They also come from different issuers: Corgi Strategies and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for FDRX and 0.75% for ASMG.
Find the right allocation for FDRX and ASMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer