FDRV vs. IBID

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FDRV (Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDRV is a Transportation Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. FDRV is actively managed, while IBID is passively managed. Over the past year, FDRV returned 29.13% vs 4.00% for IBID. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDRV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.

Performance

FDRV vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRV achieves a 15.96% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 1.94% return.

FDRV

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: -5.30%
• YTD: 15.96%
• 6M: 14.04%
• 1Y: 29.13%
• 3Y*: 2.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBID

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: -0.25%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 6M: 1.99%
• 1Y: 4.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRV vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FDRV Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF	15.96%	24.32%	-21.73%	-5.51%
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	1.94%	5.66%	4.71%	2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRV and IBID is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	0.01

The correlation between FDRV and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FDRV vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDRV

FDRV Risk / Return Rank: 35
FDRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FDRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
FDRV Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FDRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FDRV Martin Ratio Rank: 38

IBID

IBID Risk / Return Rank: 96
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 96
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRV vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDRV	IBID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	3.26	-2.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	5.52	-3.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.74	-0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	7.30	-5.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.35	28.77	-23.43

FDRV vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDRV Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDRV and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDRV vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRV drawdown since its inception was -63.89%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRV and IBID.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDRV	IBID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.89%	-1.28%	-62.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.62%	-0.55%	-15.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.84%	-0.55%	-35.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.21%	-0.22%	-41.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.46%	0.14%	+5.32%

Volatility

FDRV vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that FDRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDRV	IBID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.13%	0.35%	+12.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.64%	0.86%	+20.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.06%	1.23%	+25.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.27%	2.24%	+30.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.27%	2.24%	+30.03%

FDRV vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDRV vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

FDRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than IBID's 3.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FDRV Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF	1.23%	1.14%	0.43%	0.24%	0.33%	0.04%
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	3.68%	4.43%	4.24%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDRV and IBID in my portfolio?

FDRV and IBID have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDRV or IBID?

FDRV has higher volatility (13.13%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRV dropped -63.89% vs IBID's -1.28%.

Which ETF is better, FDRV or IBID?

On 1-year performance, FDRV leads with 29.13% vs 4.00% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDRV or IBID?

Over the 1-year period, FDRV has performed better with a 29.13% return vs 4.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDRV or IBID?

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FDRV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDRV or IBID?

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.23% for FDRV.

What is the main difference between FDRV and IBID?

FDRV is categorized as Transportation Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDRV and 0.10% for IBID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.