FDRV vs. GABF
FDRV (Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDRV is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDRV returned -2.81%/yr vs 19.89%/yr for GABF. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FDRV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.
Performance
FDRV vs. GABF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDRV achieves a 9.64% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's 0.15% return.
FDRV
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -5.30%
- 6M
- 8.32%
- YTD
- 9.64%
- 1Y
- 21.47%
- 3Y*
- -2.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -6.71%
GABF
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 0.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $89.45K | $140.01K | $198.80K | |
| $107.51K | $101.42K | $192.29K |
FDRV vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDRV Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF | 9.64% | 24.32% | -21.73% | 12.27% | -14.92% |
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | 0.15% | 3.60% | 44.38% | 38.92% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDRV and GABF is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FDRV and GABF has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FDRV vs. GABF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDRV
GABF
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDRV
GABF
-
Technology
FDRV
GABF
Industrials
FDRV
GABF
Basic Materials
FDRV
GABF
-
Communication Services
FDRV
-
GABF
-
Consumer Defensive
FDRV
-
GABF
-
Energy
FDRV
-
GABF
-
Financial Services
FDRV
-
GABF
Healthcare
FDRV
-
GABF
-
Real Estate
FDRV
-
GABF
Utilities
FDRV
-
GABF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDRV vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank
FDRV
GABF
FDRV vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDRV | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.02 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 0.03 | +1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.98 | 0.06 | +2.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDRV vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRV drawdown since its inception was -63.89%, which is greater than GABF's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRV and GABF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDRV | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.89% | -20.86% | -43.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.84% | -17.16% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.42% | -20.86% | -24.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.34% | -4.77% | -34.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.10% | -4.97% | -37.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.22% | 7.90% | -0.68% |
Volatility
FDRV vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) at 4.88%. This indicates that FDRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDRV | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.75% | 4.88% | +2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.53% | 13.34% | +9.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.71% | 17.50% | +10.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.16% | 20.39% | +11.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.16% | 20.39% | +11.77% |
FDRV vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDRV vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison
FDRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than GABF's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDRV Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF | 1.30% | 1.14% | 0.43% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.04% |
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | 1.96% | 1.96% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 1.31% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDRV and GABF have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDRV has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to GABF (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRV dropped -63.89% vs GABF's -20.86%.
On 3-year performance, GABF leads with 19.89% vs -2.81% for FDRV. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GABF has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GABF has performed better with a 19.89% return vs -2.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FDRV.
GABF has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.30% for FDRV.
FDRV is categorized as Technology Equities, while GABF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDRV and 0.10% for GABF.
FDRV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDRV and GABF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer