FDRS vs. NRSH
FDRS (Founder-Led ETF) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FDRS tracks the Founder Led Index while NRSH tracks the Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. Both are passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDRS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NRSH.
Performance
FDRS vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDRS achieves a -8.02% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 43.10% return.
FDRS
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- -8.02%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NRSH
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- 43.10%
- 6M
- 39.14%
- 1Y
- 51.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDRS vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDRS Founder-Led ETF | -8.02% | -1.34% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 43.10% | -1.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDRS and NRSH is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDRS vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank
FDRS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NRSH
FDRS vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founder-Led ETF (FDRS) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDRS | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.75 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.41 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDRS vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRS drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, smaller than the maximum NRSH drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRS and NRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDRS | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.77% | -24.01% | +2.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.40% | -3.52% | -8.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -5.56% | -3.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.60% | — |
Volatility
FDRS vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDRS | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.05% | 26.00% | +3.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.05% | 22.06% | +6.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.05% | 22.06% | +6.99% |
FDRS vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDRS vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison
FDRS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDRS Founder-Led ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.90% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDRS and NRSH have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDRS is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDRS is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.
NRSH has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for FDRS.
FDRS tracks Founder Led Index, while NRSH tracks Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. They also come from different issuers: Corgi Strategies and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FDRS and 0.75% for NRSH.
Find the right allocation for FDRS and NRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer