PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDNU.L vs. KROG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDNU.L vs. KROG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDNU.L) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FDNU.L is traded in USD, while KROG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the KROG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDNU.L achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly lower than KROG.L's 15.27% return.


FDNU.L

1D
0.72%
1M
5.40%
YTD
4.34%
6M
4.66%
1Y
10.19%
3Y*
20.73%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*

KROG.L

1D
0.47%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
15.27%
6M
14.32%
1Y
11.50%
3Y*
0.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDNU.L vs. KROG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FDNU.L
First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD
4.34%9.74%30.52%54.50%-36.04%
KROG.L
Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
15.27%7.94%-8.44%-23.03%-23.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FDNU.L and KROG.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between FDNU.L and KROG.L has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDNU.L vs. KROG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDNU.L
FDNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FDNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FDNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

KROG.L
KROG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
KROG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
KROG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDNU.L vs. KROG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDNU.L) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDNU.LKROG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.13

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

1.06

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.23

2.34

-1.11

FDNU.L vs. KROG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDNU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is comparable to the KROG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDNU.L and KROG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDNU.LKROG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

0.71

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

-0.42

+0.76

Drawdowns

FDNU.L vs. KROG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDNU.L drawdown since its inception was -54.01%, roughly equal to the maximum KROG.L drawdown of -53.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDNU.L and KROG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDNU.LKROG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.01%

-53.14%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.57%

-10.76%

-9.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.76%

-29.25%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-37.48%

+35.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.23%

-37.00%

+20.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.27%

4.91%

+3.36%

Volatility

FDNU.L vs. KROG.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDNU.L) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) have volatilities of 5.89% and 6.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDNU.LKROG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.89%

6.11%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.23%

12.61%

+2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.49%

16.06%

+3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.10%

21.20%

+4.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.91%

21.20%

+4.71%

FDNU.L vs. KROG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDNU.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than KROG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDNU.L vs. KROG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FDNU.L nor KROG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FDNU.L and KROG.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KROG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KROG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FDNU.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FDNU.L and 0.50% for KROG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDNU.L and KROG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer