FDNU.L vs. DFIV

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FDNU.L (First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD) and DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDNU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while DFIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. FDNU.L is passively managed, while DFIV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDNU.L returned 20.73%/yr vs 24.47%/yr for DFIV. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDNU.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for DFIV.

Performance

FDNU.L vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDNU.L) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDNU.L achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly lower than DFIV's 12.28% return.

FDNU.L

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 5.40%
• YTD: 4.34%
• 6M: 4.66%
• 1Y: 10.19%
• 3Y*: 20.73%
• 5Y*: 4.29%
• 10Y*: —

DFIV

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 2.19%
• YTD: 12.28%
• 6M: 15.94%
• 1Y: 35.75%
• 3Y*: 24.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDNU.L vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FDNU.L First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD	4.34%	9.74%	30.52%	54.50%	-46.64%	-7.04%
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	12.28%	45.36%	7.26%	17.75%	-3.70%	0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FDNU.L and DFIV is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021	0.34

The correlation between FDNU.L and DFIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDNU.L vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDNU.L	DFIV
Technology	37.7%	2.8%
Communication Services	29.8%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	27.7%	9.6%
Financial Services	2.4%	32.4%
Industrials	1.4%	9.6%
Healthcare	1.1%	4.9%
Basic Materials	-	10.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.9%
Energy	-	16.4%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Utilities	-	2.5%

Return for Risk

FDNU.L vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDNU.L

FDNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 17
FDNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FDNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
FDNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FDNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
FDNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 15

DFIV

DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 79
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 80
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDNU.L vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDNU.L) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDNU.L	DFIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.52	2.63	-2.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.84	3.57	-2.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.47	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.49	3.72	-3.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.23	14.37	-13.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDNU.L vs. DFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDNU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the DFIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDNU.L and DFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDNU.L	DFIV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52	2.63	-2.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.94	-0.61

Drawdowns

FDNU.L vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDNU.L drawdown since its inception was -54.01%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDNU.L and DFIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDNU.L	DFIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.01%	-25.42%	-28.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.57%	-9.66%	-10.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.76%	-14.72%	-11.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.24%	-0.36%	-1.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.23%	-4.48%	-11.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.27%	2.49%	+5.78%

Volatility

FDNU.L vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDNU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) at 3.82%. This indicates that FDNU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDNU.L	DFIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.89%	3.82%	+2.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.23%	11.00%	+4.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.49%	13.68%	+5.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.10%	16.63%	+9.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.91%	16.63%	+9.28%

FDNU.L vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDNU.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDNU.L vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison

FDNU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	2.54%	2.92%	3.88%	3.93%	3.84%	2.30%
FDNU.L First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDNU.L and DFIV in my portfolio?

FDNU.L and DFIV have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FDNU.L or DFIV?

On fees, DFIV is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDNU.L or DFIV?

DFIV is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FDNU.L.

What is the main difference between FDNU.L and DFIV?

FDNU.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while DFIV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FDNU.L and 0.27% for DFIV.