PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDNI vs. QWLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDNI vs. QWLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF (FDNI) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDNI achieves a -18.17% return, which is significantly lower than QWLD's 9.39% return.


FDNI

1D
-0.70%
1M
7.51%
6M
-16.34%
YTD
-18.17%
1Y
-14.73%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
-7.52%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.14%

QWLD

1D
0.22%
1M
1.63%
6M
6.46%
YTD
9.39%
1Y
19.11%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*
11.57%
ALL TIME*
10.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$192.35K$352.24K$738.30K
$231.12K$297.84K$1.04M

FDNI vs. QWLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FDNI
First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF
-18.17%25.64%22.46%1.78%-38.38%-20.59%85.27%38.38%-8.39%
QWLD
SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
9.39%17.93%14.44%19.59%-13.30%21.57%10.24%27.59%-6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FDNI and QWLD is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018

0.52

The correlation between FDNI and QWLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDNI vs. QWLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDNI
QWLD

Consumer Cyclical

41.2%
6.3%

Communication Services

35.0%
9.5%

Technology

19.5%
24.9%

Financial Services

3.7%
16.5%

Real Estate

0.7%
1.0%

Healthcare

0.6%
13.2%

Basic Materials

-

2.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.1%

Energy

-

3.4%

Industrials

-

10.9%

Utilities

-

3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FDNI
41.2%
QWLD
6.3%

Communication Services

FDNI
35.0%
QWLD
9.5%

Technology

FDNI
19.5%
QWLD
24.9%

Financial Services

FDNI
3.7%
QWLD
16.5%

Real Estate

FDNI
0.7%
QWLD
1.0%

Healthcare

FDNI
0.6%
QWLD
13.2%

Basic Materials

FDNI

-

QWLD
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

FDNI

-

QWLD
8.1%

Energy

FDNI

-

QWLD
3.4%

Industrials

FDNI

-

QWLD
10.9%

Utilities

FDNI

-

QWLD
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDNI vs. QWLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDNI
FDNI Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FDNI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDNI Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDNI Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FDNI Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDNI Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

QWLD
QWLD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QWLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QWLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QWLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QWLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QWLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDNI vs. QWLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF (FDNI) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDNIQWLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.34

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

2.44

-2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.77

10.67

-11.44

FDNI vs. QWLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDNI Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the QWLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDNI and QWLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDNI vs. QWLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDNI drawdown since its inception was -71.08%, which is greater than QWLD's maximum drawdown of -31.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDNI and QWLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDNIQWLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.08%

-31.89%

-39.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.42%

-7.66%

-29.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.42%

-12.40%

-25.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.70%

-22.84%

-40.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.38%

0.00%

-49.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.88%

-3.66%

-31.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.59%

1.75%

+19.84%

Volatility

FDNI vs. QWLD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF (FDNI) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) at 2.30%. This indicates that FDNI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QWLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDNIQWLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.30%

2.30%

+5.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.06%

7.73%

+12.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.13%

9.71%

+15.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.57%

13.51%

+23.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.39%

15.12%

+19.27%

FDNI vs. QWLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDNI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QWLD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDNI vs. QWLD - Dividend Comparison

FDNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than QWLD's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDNI
First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF
1.36%1.12%1.07%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.16%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QWLD
SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
1.79%1.85%1.74%1.78%2.02%1.77%1.77%2.13%2.33%2.73%2.22%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDNI and QWLD have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDNI has higher volatility (7.30%) compared to QWLD (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDNI dropped -71.08% vs QWLD's -31.89%.

On 5-year performance, QWLD leads with 10.03% vs -7.52% for FDNI. On fees, QWLD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, QWLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QWLD has performed better with a 10.03% return vs -7.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QWLD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FDNI.

QWLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.36% for FDNI.

FDNI tracks Dow Jones International Internet Index, while QWLD tracks MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series (USD). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FDNI and 0.30% for QWLD.

QWLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDNI and QWLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer