PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDNI vs. QCLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDNI vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF (FDNI) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDNI achieves a -18.17% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 10.48% return.


FDNI

1D
-0.70%
1M
7.51%
6M
-16.34%
YTD
-18.17%
1Y
-14.73%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
-7.52%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.14%

QCLN

1D
-0.26%
1M
-13.14%
6M
0.01%
YTD
10.48%
1Y
41.09%
3Y*
-2.29%
5Y*
-5.50%
10Y*
13.08%
ALL TIME*
5.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$192.35K$352.24K$738.30K
$12.39M$13.63M$14.46M

FDNI vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FDNI
First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF
-18.17%25.64%22.46%1.78%-38.38%-20.59%85.27%38.38%-8.39%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
10.48%31.81%-18.86%-10.02%-30.37%-3.21%184.00%42.65%-7.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FDNI and QCLN is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018

0.55

The correlation between FDNI and QCLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDNI vs. QCLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDNI
QCLN

Consumer Cyclical

41.2%
14.2%

Communication Services

35.0%

-

Technology

19.5%
43.0%

Financial Services

3.7%
1.5%

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Healthcare

0.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

8.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Industrials

-

25.3%

Utilities

-

7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FDNI
41.2%
QCLN
14.2%

Communication Services

FDNI
35.0%
QCLN

-

Technology

FDNI
19.5%
QCLN
43.0%

Financial Services

FDNI
3.7%
QCLN
1.5%

Real Estate

FDNI
0.7%
QCLN

-

Healthcare

FDNI
0.6%
QCLN

-

Basic Materials

FDNI

-

QCLN
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

FDNI

-

QCLN

-

Energy

FDNI

-

QCLN
0.1%

Industrials

FDNI

-

QCLN
25.3%

Utilities

FDNI

-

QCLN
7.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDNI vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDNI
FDNI Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FDNI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDNI Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDNI Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FDNI Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDNI Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLN
QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDNI vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF (FDNI) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDNIQCLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.18

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

1.25

-1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.77

4.64

-5.41

FDNI vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDNI Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDNI and QCLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDNI vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDNI drawdown since its inception was -71.08%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDNI and QCLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDNIQCLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.08%

-76.18%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.42%

-32.12%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.42%

-50.96%

+13.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.70%

-69.49%

+5.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.38%

-42.92%

-6.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.88%

-43.36%

+8.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.59%

8.62%

+12.97%

Volatility

FDNI vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF (FDNI) is 7.30%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 15.14%. This indicates that FDNI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDNIQCLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.30%

15.14%

-7.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.06%

33.63%

-13.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.13%

40.58%

-15.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.57%

38.97%

-2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.39%

35.54%

-1.15%

FDNI vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDNI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDNI vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

FDNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than QCLN's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDNI
First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF
1.36%1.12%1.07%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.16%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
0.17%0.25%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.24%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDNI and QCLN have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCLN has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to FDNI (7.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDNI dropped -71.08% vs QCLN's -76.18%.

On 5-year performance, QCLN leads with -5.50% vs -7.52% for FDNI. On fees, QCLN is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FDNI has been the lower-risk option at 7.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QCLN has performed better with a -5.50% return vs -7.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QCLN is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FDNI.

FDNI has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.17% for QCLN.

FDNI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. FDNI tracks Dow Jones International Internet Index, while QCLN tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FDNI and 0.59% for QCLN.

QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDNI and QCLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer