PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDMO vs. FELC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDMO vs. FELC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDMO achieves a 15.24% return, which is significantly higher than FELC's 11.23% return.


FDMO

1D
-0.32%
1M
7.12%
YTD
15.24%
6M
14.87%
1Y
32.96%
3Y*
28.59%
5Y*
16.35%
10Y*

FELC

1D
-0.59%
1M
5.59%
YTD
11.23%
6M
11.57%
1Y
28.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDMO vs. FELC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
15.24%21.43%32.78%5.80%
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
11.23%17.09%25.25%5.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FDMO and FELC is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023

0.93

The correlation between FDMO and FELC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDMO vs. FELC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDMO
FELC

Technology

35.7%
38.2%

Financial Services

11.7%
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.8%

Industrials

10.1%
9.6%

Communication Services

9.8%
12.4%

Healthcare

8.8%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
2.8%

Energy

3.5%
3.7%

Utilities

2.3%
1.3%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.0%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.5%

Technology

FDMO
35.7%
FELC
38.2%

Financial Services

FDMO
11.7%
FELC
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FDMO
10.1%
FELC
9.8%

Industrials

FDMO
10.1%
FELC
9.6%

Communication Services

FDMO
9.8%
FELC
12.4%

Healthcare

FDMO
8.8%
FELC
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

FDMO
4.0%
FELC
2.8%

Energy

FDMO
3.5%
FELC
3.7%

Utilities

FDMO
2.3%
FELC
1.3%

Real Estate

FDMO
2.0%
FELC
1.0%

Basic Materials

FDMO
2.0%
FELC
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDMO vs. FELC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDMO
FDMO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FELC
FELC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FELC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FELC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDMO vs. FELC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDMOFELCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.44

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

3.16

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.79

14.66

-3.87

FDMO vs. FELC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the FELC Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDMO and FELC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDMOFELCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.41

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

1.59

-0.77

Drawdowns

FDMO vs. FELC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDMO drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, which is greater than FELC's maximum drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMO and FELC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDMOFELCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.94%

-18.59%

-15.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.22%

-9.09%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.59%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-1.91%

-3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

1.95%

+1.11%

Volatility

FDMO vs. FELC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) at 2.78%. This indicates that FDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FELC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDMOFELCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

2.78%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.11%

8.93%

+4.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

11.90%

+4.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

15.17%

+3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.51%

15.17%

+4.34%

FDMO vs. FELC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDMO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FELC's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDMO vs. FELC - Dividend Comparison

FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than FELC's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
0.56%0.61%0.90%0.87%1.19%0.60%0.77%1.23%1.22%1.09%0.45%
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
0.85%0.92%1.03%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FDMO and FELC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDMO has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to FELC (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMO dropped -33.94% vs FELC's -18.59%.

On 1-year performance, FDMO leads with 32.96% vs 28.58% for FELC. On fees, FELC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FELC has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FDMO has performed better with a 32.96% return vs 28.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FELC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDMO.

FELC has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.56% for FDMO.

FDMO is categorized as Momentum, while FELC is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDMO and 0.18% for FELC.

FELC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDMO and FELC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer