FDMO vs. FDVV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FDMO (Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDMO returned 14.22%/yr vs 14.46%/yr for FDVV. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.29% expense ratio.

Performance

FDMO vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDMO achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's 13.00% return.

FDMO

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -1.50%
• 6M: 8.79%
• YTD: 11.50%
• 1Y: 22.87%
• 3Y*: 25.49%
• 5Y*: 14.22%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.38%

FDVV

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 2.82%
• 6M: 10.07%
• YTD: 13.00%
• 1Y: 22.41%
• 3Y*: 19.47%
• 5Y*: 14.46%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF	$8.23M	$8.36M	$6.07M
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	$51.30M	$49.38M	$46.34M

FDMO vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF	11.50%	21.43%	32.78%	24.79%	-19.32%	22.23%	21.71%	25.29%	-4.13%	23.93%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	13.00%	17.08%	21.81%	18.00%	-4.21%	29.24%	2.80%	24.07%	-1.26%	14.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FDMO and FDVV is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016	0.75

The correlation between FDMO and FDVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDMO vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDMO	FDVV
Technology	39.9%	28.1%
Financial Services	11.6%	18.5%
Healthcare	9.3%	3.3%
Industrials	9.3%	3.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	13.4%
Communication Services	8.4%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	11.0%
Energy	2.9%	-
Utilities	2.1%	9.1%
Real Estate	2.0%	10.0%
Basic Materials	1.9%	-

Return for Risk

FDMO vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDMO

FDMO Risk / Return Rank: 49
FDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

FDVV

FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 82
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDMO vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDMO	FDVV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	2.18	-0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	3.02	-1.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.40	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	2.42	-0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.60	9.96	-3.37

FDMO vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDMO and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDMO vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDMO drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMO and FDVV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDMO	FDVV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.94%	-40.25%	+6.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.22%	-9.30%	-2.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.88%	-15.90%	-5.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.44%	-20.18%	-5.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.32%	-0.41%	-4.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-3.76%	-1.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.48%	2.25%	+1.23%

Volatility

FDMO vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 2.98%. This indicates that FDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDMO	FDVV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.48%	2.98%	+3.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.86%	8.38%	+7.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.18%	10.34%	+8.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.46%	14.69%	+4.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.63%	16.91%	+2.72%

FDMO vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FDMO and FDVV have an expense ratio of 0.29%.

Dividends

FDMO vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than FDVV's 2.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF	0.61%	0.61%	0.90%	0.87%	1.19%	0.60%	0.77%	1.23%	1.22%	1.09%	0.45%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	2.74%	2.89%	2.94%	3.77%	3.44%	2.70%	3.19%	3.93%	4.05%	3.66%	1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDMO and FDVV in my portfolio?

FDMO and FDVV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDMO or FDVV?

FDMO has higher volatility (6.48%) compared to FDVV (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMO dropped -33.94% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

Which ETF is better, FDMO or FDVV?

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 14.46% vs 14.22% for FDMO. Both ETFs have the same 0.29% expense ratio. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDMO or FDVV?

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 14.46% return vs 14.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDMO or FDVV?

FDMO and FDVV have the same expense ratio: 0.29% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDMO or FDVV?

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 0.61% for FDMO.

What is the main difference between FDMO and FDVV?

FDMO is categorized as Momentum, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. FDMO tracks Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.