FDM vs. SMDX
FDM (First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund) and SMDX (Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. FDM is passively managed, while SMDX is actively managed. Over the past year, FDM returned 32.32% vs 30.72% for SMDX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDM charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMDX.
Performance
FDM vs. SMDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDM achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly lower than SMDX's 14.09% return.
FDM
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 12.70%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.84%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
SMDX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 14.09%
- 6M
- 14.61%
- 1Y
- 30.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDM vs. SMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDM First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund | 9.82% | 18.16% |
SMDX Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF | 14.09% | 14.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDM and SMDX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2025 | 0.80 |
The correlation between FDM and SMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDM vs. SMDX — Risk / Return Rank
FDM
SMDX
FDM vs. SMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (SMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDM | SMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.73 | 1.86 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 2.74 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.33 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 3.41 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.59 | 11.87 | -1.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDM | SMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 1.86 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 1.11 | -0.77 |
Drawdowns
FDM vs. SMDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDM drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than SMDX's maximum drawdown of -14.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDM and SMDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDM | SMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -14.52% | -48.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -8.66% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -0.24% | -1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.35% | -2.40% | -8.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 2.48% | +0.57% |
Volatility
FDM vs. SMDX - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (SMDX) have volatilities of 4.22% and 4.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDM | SMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 4.36% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.03% | 11.50% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.77% | 16.59% | +2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.37% | 21.22% | +0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.35% | 21.22% | +2.13% |
FDM vs. SMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SMDX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDM vs. SMDX - Dividend Comparison
FDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than SMDX's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDM First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.56% | 1.81% | 1.80% | 1.08% | 1.68% | 1.37% | 1.26% | 0.97% | 1.13% | 1.45% |
SMDX Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF | 0.53% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDM and SMDX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMDX has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to FDM (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDM dropped -63.45% vs SMDX's -14.52%.
On 1-year performance, FDM leads with 32.32% vs 30.72% for SMDX. On fees, SMDX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FDM has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FDM has performed better with a 32.32% return vs 30.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMDX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FDM.
FDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.53% for SMDX.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Intech. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FDM and 0.35% for SMDX.
SMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDM and SMDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer