FDM vs. RB

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FDM (First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund) and RB (ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Select Microcap Index, while RB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Russell 2000. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FDM returned 28.57% vs 18.42% for RB. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDM charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for RB.

Performance

FDM vs. RB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDM achieves a 15.49% return, which is significantly higher than RB's 8.17% return.

FDM

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.68%
• 6M: 11.76%
• YTD: 15.49%
• 1Y: 28.57%
• 3Y*: 18.64%
• 5Y*: 10.90%
• 10Y*: 11.67%

RB

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.15%
• 6M: 6.04%
• YTD: 8.17%
• 1Y: 18.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDM vs. RB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FDM First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund	15.49%	15.15%
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	8.17%	10.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FDM and RB is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.62

The correlation between FDM and RB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FDM vs. RB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDM

FDM Risk / Return Rank: 63
FDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FDM Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FDM Martin Ratio Rank: 68

RB

RB Risk / Return Rank: 96
RB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
RB Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
RB Omega Ratio Rank: 95
RB Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
RB Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDM vs. RB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDM	RB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	2.82	-1.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	4.78	-2.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.61	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	8.85	-5.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.63	28.55	-18.91

FDM vs. RB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the RB Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDM and RB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDM vs. RB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDM drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than RB's maximum drawdown of -2.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDM and RB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDM	RB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.45%	-2.09%	-61.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.30%	-2.09%	-7.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.62%	-0.28%	-2.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.30%	-0.44%	-10.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	0.65%	+2.32%

Volatility

FDM vs. RB - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) at 1.81%. This indicates that FDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDM	RB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.24%	1.81%	+2.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.24%	4.74%	+8.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.67%	6.58%	+12.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.35%	6.49%	+14.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.32%	6.49%	+16.83%

FDM vs. RB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RB's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDM vs. RB - Dividend Comparison

FDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than RB's 2.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDM First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund	1.37%	1.43%	1.56%	1.81%	1.80%	1.08%	1.68%	1.37%	1.26%	0.97%	1.13%	1.45%
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	2.26%	1.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDM and RB in my portfolio?

FDM and RB have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDM or RB?

FDM has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to RB (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDM dropped -63.45% vs RB's -2.09%.

Which ETF is better, FDM or RB?

On 1-year performance, FDM leads with 28.57% vs 18.42% for RB. On fees, RB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, RB has been the lower-risk option at 1.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDM or RB?

Over the 1-year period, FDM has performed better with a 28.57% return vs 18.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDM or RB?

RB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FDM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDM or RB?

RB has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 1.37% for FDM.

What is the main difference between FDM and RB?

FDM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RB is Defined Outcome. FDM tracks Dow Jones Select Microcap Index, while RB tracks Russell 2000. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FDM and 0.58% for RB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.