PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDM vs. IJR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDM vs. IJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDM achieves a 7.48% return, which is significantly lower than IJR's 15.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FDM has outperformed IJR with an annualized return of 11.42%, while IJR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.66% annualized return.


FDM

1D
-2.13%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
7.48%
6M
7.77%
1Y
27.59%
3Y*
18.03%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
11.42%

IJR

1D
-0.89%
1M
1.67%
YTD
15.38%
6M
14.25%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
10.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDM vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDM
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund
7.48%18.64%13.00%12.76%-11.61%35.08%-4.04%27.45%-13.53%8.72%
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
15.38%5.89%8.63%16.06%-16.20%26.58%11.28%22.82%-8.51%13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FDM and IJR is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2005

0.91

The correlation between FDM and IJR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDM vs. IJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDM
IJR

Financial Services

41.2%
16.8%

Industrials

16.4%
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
13.4%

Technology

6.2%
15.5%

Healthcare

6.2%
11.1%

Energy

5.0%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
3.5%

Basic Materials

4.2%
5.1%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.4%
7.6%

Utilities

1.0%
2.0%

Financial Services

FDM
41.2%
IJR
16.8%

Industrials

FDM
16.4%
IJR
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FDM
10.0%
IJR
13.4%

Technology

FDM
6.2%
IJR
15.5%

Healthcare

FDM
6.2%
IJR
11.1%

Energy

FDM
5.0%
IJR
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

FDM
4.7%
IJR
3.5%

Basic Materials

FDM
4.2%
IJR
5.1%

Communication Services

FDM
3.7%
IJR
3.6%

Real Estate

FDM
1.4%
IJR
7.6%

Utilities

FDM
1.0%
IJR
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDM vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDM
FDM Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

IJR
IJR Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJR Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDM vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDMIJRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.47

1.81

-0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.18

2.64

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

3.65

-0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.04

12.14

-3.10

FDM vs. IJR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the IJR Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDM and IJR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDMIJRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

1.81

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.26

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.47

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.43

-0.09

Drawdowns

FDM vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDM drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than IJR's maximum drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDM and IJR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDMIJRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.45%

-58.15%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-8.68%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.47%

-28.02%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.74%

-28.02%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.76%

-44.36%

-3.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.31%

-0.91%

-3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.35%

-9.28%

-2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.60%

+0.46%

Volatility

FDM vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) have volatilities of 4.50% and 4.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDMIJRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

4.45%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.22%

11.65%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.90%

17.54%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.39%

21.41%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.36%

22.91%

+0.45%

FDM vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IJR's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDM vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison

FDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than IJR's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDM
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund
1.28%1.43%1.56%1.81%1.80%1.08%1.68%1.37%1.26%0.97%1.13%1.45%
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
1.15%1.44%2.05%1.31%1.41%1.53%1.11%1.44%1.58%1.20%1.22%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDM and IJR have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDM has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to IJR (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDM dropped -63.45% vs IJR's -58.15%.

On 10-year performance, FDM leads with 11.42% vs 10.66% for IJR. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDM has performed better with a 11.42% return vs 10.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FDM.

FDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.15% for IJR.

FDM tracks Dow Jones Select Microcap Index, while IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FDM and 0.06% for IJR.

IJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDM and IJR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer