PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDM vs. FSCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDM vs. FSCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDM achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly lower than FSCC's 16.79% return.


FDM

1D
0.66%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
9.82%
6M
12.70%
1Y
32.32%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*
11.66%

FSCC

1D
0.74%
1M
3.29%
YTD
16.79%
6M
17.48%
1Y
42.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDM vs. FSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FDM
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund
9.82%18.64%2.04%
FSCC
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF
16.79%15.30%2.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FDM and FSCC is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024

0.86

The correlation between FDM and FSCC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDM vs. FSCC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDM
FSCC

Financial Services

41.2%
17.0%

Industrials

16.4%
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
6.4%

Technology

6.2%
16.9%

Healthcare

6.2%
17.4%

Energy

5.0%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
2.8%

Basic Materials

4.2%
3.2%

Communication Services

3.7%
2.0%

Real Estate

1.4%
6.6%

Utilities

1.0%
1.8%

Financial Services

FDM
41.2%
FSCC
17.0%

Industrials

FDM
16.4%
FSCC
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FDM
10.0%
FSCC
6.4%

Technology

FDM
6.2%
FSCC
16.9%

Healthcare

FDM
6.2%
FSCC
17.4%

Energy

FDM
5.0%
FSCC
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

FDM
4.7%
FSCC
2.8%

Basic Materials

FDM
4.2%
FSCC
3.2%

Communication Services

FDM
3.7%
FSCC
2.0%

Real Estate

FDM
1.4%
FSCC
6.6%

Utilities

FDM
1.0%
FSCC
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDM vs. FSCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDM
FDM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDM Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FSCC
FSCC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDM vs. FSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDMFSCCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

2.22

-0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

3.07

-0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

3.80

-0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.59

13.98

-3.39

FDM vs. FSCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the FSCC Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDM and FSCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDMFSCCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.22

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.86

-0.51

Drawdowns

FDM vs. FSCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDM drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than FSCC's maximum drawdown of -27.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDM and FSCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDMFSCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.45%

-27.17%

-36.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-11.07%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

-0.60%

-1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.35%

-5.19%

-6.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

3.01%

+0.04%

Volatility

FDM vs. FSCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) is 4.22%, while Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that FDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDMFSCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

5.44%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.03%

13.35%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.77%

19.11%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.37%

22.30%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.35%

22.30%

+1.05%

FDM vs. FSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FSCC's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDM vs. FSCC - Dividend Comparison

FDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than FSCC's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDM
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund
1.25%1.43%1.56%1.81%1.80%1.08%1.68%1.37%1.26%0.97%1.13%1.45%
FSCC
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF
0.23%0.27%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDM and FSCC have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSCC has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to FDM (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDM dropped -63.45% vs FSCC's -27.17%.

On 1-year performance, FSCC leads with 42.23% vs 32.32% for FDM. On fees, FSCC is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FDM has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FSCC has performed better with a 42.23% return vs 32.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FSCC is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FDM.

FDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.23% for FSCC.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Federated Hermes. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FDM and 0.36% for FSCC.

FSCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDM and FSCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer