FDM vs. FSCC
FDM (First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund) and FSCC (Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. FDM is passively managed, while FSCC is actively managed. Over the past year, FDM returned 32.32% vs 42.23% for FSCC. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDM charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FSCC.
Performance
FDM vs. FSCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDM achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly lower than FSCC's 16.79% return.
FDM
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 12.70%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.84%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
FSCC
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 6M
- 17.48%
- 1Y
- 42.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDM vs. FSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FDM First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund | 9.82% | 18.64% | 2.04% |
FSCC Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF | 16.79% | 15.30% | 2.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDM and FSCC is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024 | 0.86 |
The correlation between FDM and FSCC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDM vs. FSCC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDM
FSCC
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
FDM
FSCC
Industrials
FDM
FSCC
Consumer Cyclical
FDM
FSCC
Technology
FDM
FSCC
Healthcare
FDM
FSCC
Energy
FDM
FSCC
Consumer Defensive
FDM
FSCC
Basic Materials
FDM
FSCC
Communication Services
FDM
FSCC
Real Estate
FDM
FSCC
Utilities
FDM
FSCC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDM vs. FSCC — Risk / Return Rank
FDM
FSCC
FDM vs. FSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDM | FSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.73 | 2.22 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 3.07 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.37 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 3.80 | -0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.59 | 13.98 | -3.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDM | FSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 2.22 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.86 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
FDM vs. FSCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDM drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than FSCC's maximum drawdown of -27.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDM and FSCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDM | FSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -27.17% | -36.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -11.07% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -0.60% | -1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.35% | -5.19% | -6.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 3.01% | +0.04% |
Volatility
FDM vs. FSCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) is 4.22%, while Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that FDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDM | FSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 5.44% | -1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.03% | 13.35% | -0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.77% | 19.11% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.37% | 22.30% | -0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.35% | 22.30% | +1.05% |
FDM vs. FSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FSCC's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDM vs. FSCC - Dividend Comparison
FDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than FSCC's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDM First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.56% | 1.81% | 1.80% | 1.08% | 1.68% | 1.37% | 1.26% | 0.97% | 1.13% | 1.45% |
FSCC Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDM and FSCC have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSCC has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to FDM (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDM dropped -63.45% vs FSCC's -27.17%.
On 1-year performance, FSCC leads with 42.23% vs 32.32% for FDM. On fees, FSCC is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FDM has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FSCC has performed better with a 42.23% return vs 32.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSCC is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FDM.
FDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.23% for FSCC.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Federated Hermes. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FDM and 0.36% for FSCC.
FSCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDM and FSCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer