FDM vs. ESIX
FDM (First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund) and ESIX (SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - FDM tracks the Dow Jones Select Microcap Index while ESIX tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDM returned 18.88%/yr vs 14.39%/yr for ESIX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDM charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for ESIX.
Performance
FDM vs. ESIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDM achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly lower than ESIX's 10.83% return.
FDM
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 12.70%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.84%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
ESIX
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- 24.20%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDM vs. ESIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDM First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund | 9.82% | 18.64% | 13.00% | 12.76% | -11.32% |
ESIX SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF | 10.83% | 1.83% | 9.66% | 17.51% | -14.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDM and ESIX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2022 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FDM and ESIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FDM vs. ESIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDM
ESIX
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
FDM
ESIX
Industrials
FDM
ESIX
Consumer Cyclical
FDM
ESIX
Technology
FDM
ESIX
Healthcare
FDM
ESIX
Energy
FDM
ESIX
Consumer Defensive
FDM
ESIX
Basic Materials
FDM
ESIX
Communication Services
FDM
ESIX
Real Estate
FDM
ESIX
Utilities
FDM
ESIX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDM vs. ESIX — Risk / Return Rank
FDM
ESIX
FDM vs. ESIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF (ESIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDM | ESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.73 | 1.20 | +0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 1.84 | +0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.21 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 2.51 | +0.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.59 | 7.94 | +2.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDM | ESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 1.20 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.24 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
FDM vs. ESIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDM drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than ESIX's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDM and ESIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDM | ESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -27.56% | -35.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -10.18% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.47% | -27.56% | +4.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -2.42% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.35% | -8.59% | -2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 3.22% | -0.17% |
Volatility
FDM vs. ESIX - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF (ESIX) have volatilities of 4.22% and 4.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDM | ESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 4.19% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.03% | 12.40% | +0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.77% | 17.99% | +0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.37% | 21.53% | -0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.35% | 21.53% | +1.82% |
FDM vs. ESIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIX's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDM vs. ESIX - Dividend Comparison
FDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than ESIX's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIX SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF | 1.45% | 1.64% | 1.65% | 1.69% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDM First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.56% | 1.81% | 1.80% | 1.08% | 1.68% | 1.37% | 1.26% | 0.97% | 1.13% | 1.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDM and ESIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDM has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to ESIX (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDM dropped -63.45% vs ESIX's -27.56%.
On 3-year performance, FDM leads with 18.88% vs 14.39% for ESIX. On fees, ESIX is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FDM has performed better with a 18.88% return vs 14.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESIX is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FDM.
ESIX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.25% for FDM.
FDM tracks Dow Jones Select Microcap Index, while ESIX tracks S&P SmallCap 600 ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FDM and 0.12% for ESIX.
FDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDM and ESIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer