PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDM vs. BBSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDM vs. BBSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDM achieves a 7.48% return, which is significantly lower than BBSC's 15.75% return.


FDM

1D
-2.13%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
7.48%
6M
7.77%
1Y
27.59%
3Y*
18.03%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
11.42%

BBSC

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.71%
YTD
15.75%
6M
14.20%
1Y
35.98%
3Y*
17.34%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDM vs. BBSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FDM
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund
7.48%18.64%13.00%12.76%-11.61%35.08%9.49%
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
15.75%10.38%12.31%20.07%-19.75%15.44%11.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FDM and BBSC is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020

0.90

The correlation between FDM and BBSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDM vs. BBSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDM
BBSC

Financial Services

41.2%
16.9%

Industrials

16.4%
14.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.0%

Technology

6.2%
18.5%

Healthcare

6.2%
15.7%

Energy

5.0%
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
3.2%

Basic Materials

4.2%
4.1%

Communication Services

3.7%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.4%
7.7%

Utilities

1.0%
1.2%

Financial Services

FDM
41.2%
BBSC
16.9%

Industrials

FDM
16.4%
BBSC
14.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FDM
10.0%
BBSC
9.0%

Technology

FDM
6.2%
BBSC
18.5%

Healthcare

FDM
6.2%
BBSC
15.7%

Energy

FDM
5.0%
BBSC
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

FDM
4.7%
BBSC
3.2%

Basic Materials

FDM
4.2%
BBSC
4.1%

Communication Services

FDM
3.7%
BBSC
2.4%

Real Estate

FDM
1.4%
BBSC
7.7%

Utilities

FDM
1.0%
BBSC
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDM vs. BBSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDM
FDM Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

BBSC
BBSC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BBSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDM vs. BBSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDMBBSCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.47

1.90

-0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.18

2.70

-0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

3.79

-0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.04

12.35

-3.31

FDM vs. BBSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the BBSC Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDM and BBSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDMBBSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

1.90

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.29

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.49

-0.14

Drawdowns

FDM vs. BBSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDM drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than BBSC's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDM and BBSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDMBBSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.45%

-30.96%

-32.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-9.54%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.47%

-29.32%

+5.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.74%

-30.96%

+7.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.31%

-1.48%

-2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.35%

-11.49%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.92%

+0.14%

Volatility

FDM vs. BBSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) is 4.50%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that FDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDMBBSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

4.91%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.22%

12.98%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.90%

19.12%

-0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.39%

22.93%

-1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.36%

22.86%

+0.50%

FDM vs. BBSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSC's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDM vs. BBSC - Dividend Comparison

FDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than BBSC's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.03%1.13%1.29%1.58%1.37%1.06%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDM
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund
1.28%1.43%1.56%1.81%1.80%1.08%1.68%1.37%1.26%0.97%1.13%1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDM and BBSC have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBSC has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to FDM (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDM dropped -63.45% vs BBSC's -30.96%.

On 5-year performance, FDM leads with 8.37% vs 6.64% for BBSC. On fees, BBSC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FDM has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDM has performed better with a 8.37% return vs 6.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBSC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FDM.

FDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.03% for BBSC.

FDM tracks Dow Jones Select Microcap Index, while BBSC tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FDM and 0.09% for BBSC.

BBSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDM and BBSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer