FDLS vs. ETHO

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

FDLS (Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF) and ETHO (Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - FDLS tracks the WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross while ETHO tracks the Etho Climate Leadership Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FDLS returned 34.94% vs 39.93% for ETHO. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FDLS charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ETHO.

Performance

FDLS vs. ETHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDLS achieves a 20.96% return, which is significantly lower than ETHO's 25.88% return.

FDLS

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 2.23%
• 6M: 14.07%
• YTD: 20.96%
• 1Y: 34.94%
• 3Y*: 18.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.47%

ETHO

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 2.96%
• 6M: 19.96%
• YTD: 25.88%
• 1Y: 39.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	$225.65K	$212.15K	$289.55K
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF	$1.17M	$1.57M	$1.61M

FDLS vs. ETHO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF	20.96%	22.47%	8.66%
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	25.88%	10.23%	11.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FDLS and ETHO is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2024	0.89

The correlation between FDLS and ETHO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDLS vs. ETHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDLS	ETHO
Technology	25.3%	25.9%
Financial Services	15.3%	13.8%
Industrials	13.0%	15.2%
Healthcare	12.8%	13.1%
Energy	9.2%	0.3%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	10.6%
Basic Materials	7.5%	4.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	4.7%
Communication Services	2.3%	3.6%
Real Estate	1.9%	6.0%
Utilities	1.0%	2.4%

Return for Risk

FDLS vs. ETHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDLS

FDLS Risk / Return Rank: 82
FDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

ETHO

ETHO Risk / Return Rank: 87
ETHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
ETHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
ETHO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
ETHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ETHO Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDLS vs. ETHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDLS	ETHO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	2.25	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	3.15	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.38	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.68	4.34	-0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.57	16.85	-2.28

FDLS vs. ETHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDLS Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the ETHO Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLS and ETHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDLS vs. ETHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLS drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, smaller than the maximum ETHO drawdown of -25.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLS and ETHO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDLS	ETHO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.32%	-25.50%	+2.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.55%	-9.25%	-0.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-0.78%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-4.28%	+0.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	2.38%	+0.02%

Volatility

FDLS vs. ETHO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) is 3.83%, while Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that FDLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDLS	ETHO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.83%	4.69%	-0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.46%	13.34%	-0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.03%	17.83%	-0.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.90%	19.31%	-0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.90%	19.31%	-0.41%

FDLS vs. ETHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHO's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDLS vs. ETHO - Dividend Comparison

FDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than ETHO's 0.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	0.68%	0.86%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF	0.79%	0.86%	7.26%	0.97%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDLS and ETHO in my portfolio?

FDLS and ETHO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDLS or ETHO?

ETHO has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to FDLS (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLS dropped -23.32% vs ETHO's -25.50%.

Which ETF is better, FDLS or ETHO?

On 1-year performance, ETHO leads with 39.93% vs 34.94% for FDLS. On fees, ETHO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDLS has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDLS or ETHO?

Over the 1-year period, ETHO has performed better with a 39.93% return vs 34.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDLS or ETHO?

ETHO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for FDLS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDLS or ETHO?

FDLS has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.68% for ETHO.

What is the main difference between FDLS and ETHO?

FDLS tracks WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ETHO tracks Etho Climate Leadership Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for FDLS and 0.45% for ETHO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ETHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.