PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDLO vs. FELC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDLO vs. FELC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDLO achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than FELC's 11.33% return.


FDLO

1D
0.23%
1M
1.82%
6M
4.29%
YTD
6.18%
1Y
13.30%
3Y*
13.54%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*

FELC

1D
-0.73%
1M
2.04%
6M
9.70%
YTD
11.33%
1Y
23.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDLO vs. FELC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
6.18%11.77%16.06%4.13%
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
11.33%17.09%25.25%6.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FDLO and FELC is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023

0.78

The correlation between FDLO and FELC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDLO vs. FELC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDLO
FELC

Technology

35.5%
40.8%

Financial Services

12.1%
12.3%

Communication Services

10.6%
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.0%

Healthcare

9.6%
7.4%

Industrials

8.3%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
2.5%

Energy

3.2%
2.8%

Utilities

2.2%
1.3%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.4%

Technology

FDLO
35.5%
FELC
40.8%

Financial Services

FDLO
12.1%
FELC
12.3%

Communication Services

FDLO
10.6%
FELC
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FDLO
10.1%
FELC
10.0%

Healthcare

FDLO
9.6%
FELC
7.4%

Industrials

FDLO
8.3%
FELC
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

FDLO
4.6%
FELC
2.5%

Energy

FDLO
3.2%
FELC
2.8%

Utilities

FDLO
2.2%
FELC
1.3%

Real Estate

FDLO
2.2%
FELC
1.1%

Basic Materials

FDLO
1.7%
FELC
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDLO vs. FELC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDLO
FDLO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FDLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FELC
FELC Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FELC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FELC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDLO vs. FELC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDLOFELCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.34

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

2.60

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.60

11.37

-3.77

FDLO vs. FELC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the FELC Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLO and FELC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDLO vs. FELC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLO drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, which is greater than FELC's maximum drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLO and FELC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDLOFELCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.35%

-18.59%

-15.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-9.09%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.73%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.36%

-1.90%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

2.07%

-0.32%

Volatility

FDLO vs. FELC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) is 3.01%, while Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that FDLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDLOFELCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

4.07%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.87%

10.03%

-3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.94%

12.66%

-3.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.10%

15.21%

-2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.46%

15.21%

+0.25%

FDLO vs. FELC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FELC's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FDLO vs. FELC - Dividend Comparison

FDLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than FELC's 0.84% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
1.40%1.37%1.40%1.35%1.49%1.11%1.38%1.55%1.76%1.61%0.55%
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
0.84%0.92%1.03%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDLO and FELC have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FELC has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to FDLO (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLO dropped -34.35% vs FELC's -18.59%.

On 1-year performance, FELC leads with 23.48% vs 13.30% for FDLO. On fees, FDLO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FDLO has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FELC has performed better with a 23.48% return vs 13.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDLO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for FELC.

FDLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.84% for FELC.

FDLO is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while FELC is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FDLO and 0.18% for FELC.

FELC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDLO and FELC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer