PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDLO vs. FAPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FDLO vs. FAPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond (FAPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FDLO vs. FAPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
-2.35%11.77%16.06%16.38%-6.23%
FAPGX
Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond
0.49%4.57%5.32%5.28%0.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDLO achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly lower than FAPGX's 0.49% return.


FDLO

1D
0.48%
1M
-4.39%
YTD
-2.35%
6M
-0.81%
1Y
8.58%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*

FAPGX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
0.49%
6M
1.44%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
4.83%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDLO vs. FAPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FAPGX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FDLO vs. FAPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDLO
FDLO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FDLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLO Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FAPGX
FAPGX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FAPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FAPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDLO vs. FAPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond (FAPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDLOFAPGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.63

3.63

-2.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.99

8.39

-7.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

2.75

-1.61

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

14.12

-13.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.92

56.83

-52.91

FDLO vs. FAPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDLO Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the FAPGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLO and FAPGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDLOFAPGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

3.63

-2.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

3.87

-3.08

Correlation

The correlation between FDLO and FAPGX is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FDLO vs. FAPGX - Dividend Comparison

FDLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than FAPGX's 4.26% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
1.46%1.37%1.40%1.35%1.49%1.11%1.38%1.55%1.76%1.61%0.55%
FAPGX
Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond
4.26%4.40%4.81%3.44%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FDLO vs. FAPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLO drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, which is greater than FAPGX's maximum drawdown of -0.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLO and FAPGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FDLOFAPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.35%

-0.49%

-33.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-0.29%

-10.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.06%

-0.20%

-4.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-0.07%

-3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

0.07%

+2.14%

Volatility

FDLO vs. FAPGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond (FAPGX) at 0.26%. This indicates that FDLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FDLOFAPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

0.26%

+3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.73%

0.82%

+5.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.61%

1.10%

+12.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.12%

1.06%

+12.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.60%

1.06%

+14.54%