PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDLO vs. FAPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDLO vs. FAPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond (FAPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDLO achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly higher than FAPGX's 1.39% return.


FDLO

1D
0.36%
1M
1.29%
YTD
5.38%
6M
4.87%
1Y
15.69%
3Y*
14.49%
5Y*
10.20%
10Y*

FAPGX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.75%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
4.91%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDLO vs. FAPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
5.38%11.77%16.06%16.38%-6.23%
FAPGX
Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond
1.39%4.57%5.32%5.28%0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FDLO and FAPGX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2022

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDLO vs. FAPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDLO
FDLO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FDLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FAPGX
FAPGX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FAPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FAPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDLO vs. FAPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond (FAPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDLOFAPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

3.24

-1.92

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

14.05

-11.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.62

64.52

-54.91

FDLO vs. FAPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is lower than the FAPGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLO and FAPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDLOFAPGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

3.69

-1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

3.88

-3.05

Drawdowns

FDLO vs. FAPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLO drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, which is greater than FAPGX's maximum drawdown of -0.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLO and FAPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDLOFAPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.35%

-0.49%

-33.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-0.29%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

-0.39%

-13.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

0.00%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-0.06%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

0.06%

+1.57%

Volatility

FDLO vs. FAPGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) has a higher volatility of 1.91% compared to Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond (FAPGX) at 0.26%. This indicates that FDLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDLOFAPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

0.26%

+1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.42%

0.83%

+5.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.75%

1.12%

+7.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.06%

1.07%

+11.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.50%

1.07%

+14.43%

FDLO vs. FAPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FAPGX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDLO vs. FAPGX - Dividend Comparison

FDLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than FAPGX's 4.63% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FAPGX
Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond
4.63%4.40%4.81%3.44%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
1.36%1.37%1.40%1.35%1.49%1.11%1.38%1.55%1.76%1.61%0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDLO and FAPGX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDLO has higher volatility (1.91%) compared to FAPGX (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLO dropped -34.35% vs FAPGX's -0.49%.

FAPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDLO and FAPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer