FDKLX vs. VT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDKLX (Fidelity Freedom Index 2060 Fund Investor Class) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both funds - FDKLX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Fidelity, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, FDKLX returned 11.93%/yr vs 12.74%/yr for VT. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FDKLX charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

FDKLX vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2060 Fund Investor Class (FDKLX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FDKLX having a 12.67% return and VT slightly lower at 12.24%. Over the past 10 years, FDKLX has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 11.93%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.

FDKLX

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 5.62%
• YTD: 12.67%
• 6M: 13.58%
• 1Y: 28.76%
• 3Y*: 19.56%
• 5Y*: 10.12%
• 10Y*: 11.93%

VT

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 4.91%
• YTD: 12.24%
• 6M: 13.14%
• 1Y: 29.24%
• 3Y*: 20.93%
• 5Y*: 10.99%
• 10Y*: 12.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDKLX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDKLX Fidelity Freedom Index 2060 Fund Investor Class	12.67%	21.38%	14.16%	19.91%	-18.18%	15.88%	16.38%	26.06%	-7.23%	20.58%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	12.24%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	18.27%	16.59%	26.81%	-9.76%	24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FDKLX and VT is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2014	0.99

The correlation between FDKLX and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDKLX vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDKLX	VT
Technology	25.9%	27.8%
Financial Services	17.1%	15.9%
Industrials	11.7%	12.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	9.5%
Healthcare	9.1%	8.1%
Communication Services	8.0%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	4.8%
Energy	4.7%	4.3%
Basic Materials	4.1%	4.2%
Utilities	2.8%	2.7%
Real Estate	2.1%	2.4%

Return for Risk

FDKLX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDKLX

FDKLX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FDKLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FDKLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FDKLX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FDKLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FDKLX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 67
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDKLX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2060 Fund Investor Class (FDKLX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDKLX	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	2.31	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	3.20	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.42	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	3.04	+0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.19	13.53	+0.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDKLX vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDKLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDKLX and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDKLX	VT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	2.31	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.69	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	0.74	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.44	+0.27

Drawdowns

FDKLX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDKLX drawdown since its inception was -30.73%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDKLX and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDKLX	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.73%	-50.27%	+19.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.11%	-9.67%	+0.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.73%	-16.51%	+1.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.19%	-26.38%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.73%	-34.24%	+3.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.88%	+0.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.57%	-7.02%	+2.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	2.17%	-0.12%

Volatility

FDKLX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2060 Fund Investor Class (FDKLX) is 3.55%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that FDKLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDKLX	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.55%	3.83%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.44%	10.17%	-0.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.66%	12.70%	-1.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.39%	16.05%	-1.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.16%	17.23%	-2.07%

FDKLX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDKLX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FDKLX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

FDKLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDKLX Fidelity Freedom Index 2060 Fund Investor Class	1.68%	1.95%	1.94%	1.89%	1.99%	1.86%	1.79%	6.74%	2.33%	2.12%	2.41%	1.82%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.59%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDKLX and VT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, FDKLX and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FDKLX or VT?

VT has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to FDKLX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDKLX dropped -30.73% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDKLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.