FDIQ vs. SPCZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) and RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPCZ).
FDIQ and SPCZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDIQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2011. SPCZ is an actively managed fund by RiverNorth. It was launched on Jul 11, 2022.
Performance
FDIQ vs. SPCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDIQ vs. SPCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF | 11.45% | 6.32% | 12.76% | -0.84% | 6.88% |
SPCZ RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF | -0.15% | 10.19% | 5.31% | 5.93% | 1.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIQ achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly higher than SPCZ's -0.15% return.
FDIQ
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -5.59%
- YTD
- 11.45%
- 6M
- 14.36%
- 1Y
- 25.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 5.11%
- 10Y*
- 8.58%
SPCZ
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- -0.15%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- 1Y
- 8.26%
- 3Y*
- 6.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDIQ vs. SPCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SPCZ's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDIQ vs. SPCZ — Risk / Return Rank
FDIQ
SPCZ
FDIQ vs. SPCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) and RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDIQ | SPCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 1.33 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 1.98 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.33 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 2.37 | -0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.45 | 6.30 | -0.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDIQ | SPCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.33 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 1.22 | -0.84 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIQ and SPCZ is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FDIQ vs. SPCZ - Dividend Comparison
FDIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than SPCZ's 12.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF | 2.52% | 2.66% | 2.69% | 2.89% | 2.51% | 2.04% | 2.92% | 2.44% | 2.45% | 1.59% | 1.50% | 1.92% |
SPCZ RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF | 12.08% | 12.06% | 4.24% | 5.01% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FDIQ vs. SPCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIQ drawdown since its inception was -52.86%, which is greater than SPCZ's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIQ and SPCZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIQ | SPCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.86% | -4.47% | -48.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.15% | -3.50% | -10.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.08% | -2.77% | -4.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.64% | -0.43% | -11.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.84% | 1.32% | +3.52% |
Volatility
FDIQ vs. SPCZ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) has a higher volatility of 5.91% compared to RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPCZ) at 1.31%. This indicates that FDIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDIQ | SPCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.91% | 1.31% | +4.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.49% | 4.19% | +13.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.55% | 6.25% | +21.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.94% | 5.12% | +23.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.21% | 5.12% | +26.09% |