PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIQ vs. INDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIQ vs. INDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) and Nifty India Financials ETF (INDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FDIQ

1D
-0.97%
1M
-5.53%
YTD
9.72%
6M
10.28%
1Y
22.98%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
7.60%

INDF

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIQ vs. INDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FDIQ
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF
9.72%6.32%12.76%-0.84%-7.23%36.05%31.73%
INDF
Nifty India Financials ETF
0.00%8.17%6.32%19.86%-5.28%11.95%23.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIQ and INDF is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2020

0.31

The correlation between FDIQ and INDF shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIQ vs. INDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIQ
FDIQ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FDIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

INDF
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIQ vs. INDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) and Nifty India Financials ETF (INDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDIQINDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.26

FDIQ vs. INDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDIQINDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

Drawdowns

FDIQ vs. INDF - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDIQINDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

Volatility

FDIQ vs. INDF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDIQINDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.12%

FDIQ vs. INDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than INDF's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDIQ vs. INDF - Dividend Comparison

FDIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than INDF's 21.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIQ
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF
2.56%2.66%2.69%2.89%2.51%2.04%2.92%2.44%2.45%1.59%1.50%1.92%
INDF
Nifty India Financials ETF
21.29%21.29%6.15%8.84%3.12%1.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIQ and INDF have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FDIQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FDIQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for INDF.

INDF has the higher dividend yield at 21.29%, compared with 2.56% for FDIQ.

FDIQ tracks Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index, while INDF tracks Nifty Financial Services 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FDIQ and 0.75% for INDF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIQ and INDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer