FDIG vs. QSOL
FDIG (Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF) and QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDIG is a Blockchain fund tracking the Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments Index, while QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return. Both are passively managed. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FDIG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QSOL.
Performance
FDIG vs. QSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIG achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly higher than QSOL's -39.59% return.
FDIG
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 8.83%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 21.47%
- 3Y*
- 26.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.86%
QSOL
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -8.16%
- 6M
- -28.09%
- YTD
- -39.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.06M | $1.10M | $1.89M | |
| $128.84K | $80.12K | $102.22K |
FDIG vs. QSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDIG Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF | 9.43% | -9.03% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | -39.59% | -4.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIG and QSOL is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIG vs. QSOL — Risk / Return Rank
FDIG
QSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDIG vs. QSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) and Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDIG | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.82 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDIG vs. QSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIG drawdown since its inception was -61.35%, which is greater than QSOL's maximum drawdown of -56.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIG and QSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIG | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.35% | -56.55% | -4.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.52% | -49.21% | +21.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.49% | -36.43% | +8.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.28% | — | — |
Volatility
FDIG vs. QSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIG | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.07% | 69.40% | -18.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.57% | 69.40% | -8.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.57% | 69.40% | -8.83% |
FDIG vs. QSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than QSOL's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDIG vs. QSOL - Dividend Comparison
FDIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than QSOL's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIG Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF | 1.49% | 1.14% | 1.17% | 0.18% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIG and QSOL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FDIG.
FDIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.92% for QSOL.
FDIG is categorized as Blockchain, while QSOL is Cryptocurrency. FDIG tracks Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments Index, while QSOL tracks Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDIG and 0.25% for QSOL.
Find the right allocation for FDIG and QSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer