PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDHY vs. MNHYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDHY vs. MNHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced High Yield ETF (FDHY) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FDHY having a 2.55% return and MNHYX slightly higher at 2.61%.


FDHY

1D
0.20%
1M
-0.09%
6M
1.93%
YTD
2.55%
1Y
6.83%
3Y*
8.28%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.67%

MNHYX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.25%
6M
1.88%
YTD
2.61%
1Y
5.96%
3Y*
8.59%
5Y*
5.30%
10Y*
6.27%
ALL TIME*
6.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.51M$4.35M$4.06M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FDHY vs. MNHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FDHY
Fidelity Enhanced High Yield ETF
2.55%9.24%7.53%11.14%-11.30%4.33%10.71%16.87%-2.35%
MNHYX
Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series
2.61%6.65%9.63%13.19%-7.59%9.99%6.26%13.99%-1.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FDHY and MNHYX is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2018

0.55

The correlation between FDHY and MNHYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDHY vs. MNHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDHY
FDHY Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FDHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDHY Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FDHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDHY Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

MNHYX
MNHYX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MNHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MNHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDHY vs. MNHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced High Yield ETF (FDHY) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDHYMNHYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.47

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

2.34

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.35

10.40

+2.96

FDHY vs. MNHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the MNHYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDHY and MNHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDHY vs. MNHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDHY drawdown since its inception was -20.01%, roughly equal to the maximum MNHYX drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDHY and MNHYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDHYMNHYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.01%

-19.70%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.12%

-2.51%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.26%

-4.43%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.38%

-10.84%

-5.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.56%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.83%

-1.55%

-1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.51%

0.56%

-0.05%

Volatility

FDHY vs. MNHYX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced High Yield ETF (FDHY) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) at 0.70%. This indicates that FDHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDHYMNHYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

0.70%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.84%

2.27%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.60%

2.76%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.13%

3.71%

+3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.98%

4.11%

+3.87%

FDHY vs. MNHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDHY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MNHYX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDHY vs. MNHYX - Dividend Comparison

FDHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, less than MNHYX's 6.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDHY
Fidelity Enhanced High Yield ETF
6.54%6.56%6.58%6.26%5.34%6.09%5.78%4.94%2.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MNHYX
Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series
6.68%6.95%6.38%6.66%5.93%7.93%4.98%6.63%5.26%5.16%6.49%5.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDHY and MNHYX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDHY has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to MNHYX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDHY dropped -20.01% vs MNHYX's -19.70%.

MNHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDHY and MNHYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer