FDGRX vs. RPMGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) and T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX).
FDGRX is managed by Fidelity. RPMGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 30, 1992.
Performance
FDGRX vs. RPMGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDGRX vs. RPMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund | -2.70% | 18.54% | 37.18% | 47.25% | -33.86% | 22.57% | 67.42% | 38.40% | -4.14% | 36.76% |
RPMGX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund | -4.07% | 10.55% | 21.08% | 20.27% | -22.51% | 14.94% | 24.16% | 31.53% | -2.12% | 24.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDGRX achieves a -2.70% return, which is significantly higher than RPMGX's -4.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FDGRX has outperformed RPMGX with an annualized return of 20.34%, while RPMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.27% annualized return.
FDGRX
- 1D
- 4.47%
- 1M
- -4.63%
- YTD
- -2.70%
- 6M
- -3.20%
- 1Y
- 31.14%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- 20.34%
RPMGX
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -4.07%
- 6M
- 3.44%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDGRX vs. RPMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDGRX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than RPMGX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDGRX vs. RPMGX — Risk / Return Rank
FDGRX
RPMGX
FDGRX vs. RPMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) and T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDGRX | RPMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 0.72 | +0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | 1.20 | +0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.16 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 1.13 | +0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.42 | 4.47 | +2.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDGRX | RPMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 0.72 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.29 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.59 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDGRX and RPMGX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDGRX vs. RPMGX - Dividend Comparison
FDGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RPMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.24%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.86% | 3.83% | 7.20% | 10.67% | 8.86% | 3.84% | 6.38% | 4.73% | 6.16% | 3.92% |
RPMGX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund | 13.24% | 12.70% | 20.43% | 6.35% | 2.60% | 10.52% | 4.53% | 5.29% | 12.12% | 8.04% | 3.45% | 9.51% |
Drawdowns
FDGRX vs. RPMGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDGRX drawdown since its inception was -71.62%, which is greater than RPMGX's maximum drawdown of -54.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGRX and RPMGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDGRX | RPMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.62% | -54.66% | -16.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -12.47% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.25% | -32.08% | -8.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.25% | -35.96% | -4.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.69% | -7.71% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.97% | -6.99% | -8.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 3.16% | +0.58% |
Volatility
FDGRX vs. RPMGX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) at 5.75%. This indicates that FDGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDGRX | RPMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.21% | 5.75% | +2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.30% | 11.80% | +3.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.68% | 19.72% | +4.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.97% | 19.27% | +4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.33% | 19.06% | +4.27% |