FDGKX vs. NPRTX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FDGKX (Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K) and NPRTX (Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FDGKX returned 14.14%/yr vs 14.38%/yr for NPRTX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDGKX charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for NPRTX.

Performance

FDGKX vs. NPRTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) and Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund (NPRTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGKX achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly lower than NPRTX's 20.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDGKX having a 14.14% annualized return and NPRTX not far ahead at 14.38%.

FDGKX

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 2.79%
• YTD: 18.03%
• 6M: 14.19%
• 1Y: 35.58%
• 3Y*: 25.36%
• 5Y*: 15.21%
• 10Y*: 14.14%

NPRTX

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 3.05%
• YTD: 20.12%
• 6M: 19.37%
• 1Y: 38.09%
• 3Y*: 17.44%
• 5Y*: 10.43%
• 10Y*: 14.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGKX vs. NPRTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDGKX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K	18.03%	19.47%	24.72%	18.00%	-11.54%	28.10%	2.31%	28.84%	-7.09%	18.03%
NPRTX Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund	20.12%	20.69%	10.92%	-1.76%	-1.25%	28.12%	14.44%	23.96%	-1.23%	13.45%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGKX and NPRTX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2008	0.87

The correlation between FDGKX and NPRTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (3 years) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FDGKX vs. NPRTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGKX

FDGKX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FDGKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FDGKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
FDGKX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FDGKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
FDGKX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

NPRTX

NPRTX Risk / Return Rank: 95
NPRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
NPRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
NPRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
NPRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
NPRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGKX vs. NPRTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) and Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund (NPRTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDGKX	NPRTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	3.35	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	4.60	-1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.61	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.62	5.57	-1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.61	22.66	-7.06

FDGKX vs. NPRTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the NPRTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGKX and NPRTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDGKX vs. NPRTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGKX drawdown since its inception was -53.34%, smaller than the maximum NPRTX drawdown of -66.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGKX and NPRTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDGKX	NPRTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.34%	-66.25%	+12.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.15%	-7.03%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.35%	-13.79%	-7.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.35%	-19.82%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.28%	-39.01%	-2.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-0.33%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.52%	-9.25%	+2.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	1.72%	+0.62%

Volatility

FDGKX vs. NPRTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund (NPRTX) at 4.22%. This indicates that FDGKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NPRTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDGKX	NPRTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.04%	4.22%	+1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.15%	9.48%	+2.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.80%	11.73%	+3.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.84%	14.11%	+2.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.34%	17.60%	+1.74%

FDGKX vs. NPRTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGKX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than NPRTX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDGKX vs. NPRTX - Dividend Comparison

FDGKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, more than NPRTX's 5.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDGKX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K	5.95%	6.82%	7.46%	3.57%	11.59%	7.90%	1.98%	4.95%	23.08%	15.37%	1.70%	8.50%
NPRTX Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund	5.35%	6.42%	2.19%	2.45%	1.56%	5.04%	1.60%	3.87%	14.44%	8.55%	3.58%	9.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDGKX and NPRTX in my portfolio?

FDGKX and NPRTX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDGKX or NPRTX?

FDGKX has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to NPRTX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGKX dropped -53.34% vs NPRTX's -66.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NPRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.