FDGDX vs. HFQAX
FDGDX (Fidelity Advisor 529 Dividend Growth Portfolio Class D) and HFQAX (Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund) are both Dividend funds. Over the past 5 years, FDGDX returned 14.18%/yr vs 11.82%/yr for HFQAX. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
FDGDX vs. HFQAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDGDX achieves a 15.24% return, which is significantly lower than HFQAX's 17.80% return.
FDGDX
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 9.87%
- YTD
- 15.24%
- 1Y
- 26.19%
- 3Y*
- 23.05%
- 5Y*
- 14.18%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.16%
HFQAX
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- 6M
- 10.24%
- YTD
- 17.80%
- 1Y
- 30.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- 11.82%
- 10Y*
- 8.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FDGDX vs. HFQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDGDX Fidelity Advisor 529 Dividend Growth Portfolio Class D | 15.24% | 21.56% | 26.30% | 16.72% | -12.54% | 27.06% | 1.32% | 27.67% | -7.58% | 17.77% |
HFQAX Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund | 17.80% | 29.61% | 6.86% | 10.17% | -6.59% | 12.45% | 1.66% | 20.87% | -15.86% | 17.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDGDX and HFQAX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FDGDX and HFQAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDGDX vs. HFQAX — Risk / Return Rank
FDGDX
HFQAX
FDGDX vs. HFQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor 529 Dividend Growth Portfolio Class D (FDGDX) and Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDGDX | HFQAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.44 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 2.81 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.26 | 10.08 | +1.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDGDX vs. HFQAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDGDX drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, smaller than the maximum HFQAX drawdown of -52.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGDX and HFQAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDGDX | HFQAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.44% | -52.77% | +14.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.23% | -9.99% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.70% | -12.20% | -9.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.70% | -21.83% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | 0.00% | -2.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.37% | -10.79% | +5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 2.78% | -0.33% |
Volatility
FDGDX vs. HFQAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor 529 Dividend Growth Portfolio Class D (FDGDX) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX) at 3.78%. This indicates that FDGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDGDX | HFQAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 3.78% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.34% | 10.34% | +2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.42% | 12.09% | +3.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 13.07% | +4.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 14.44% | +4.95% |
Dividends
FDGDX vs. HFQAX - Dividend Comparison
FDGDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HFQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDGDX Fidelity Advisor 529 Dividend Growth Portfolio Class D | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HFQAX Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund | 5.79% | 6.59% | 7.96% | 7.89% | 8.02% | 6.92% | 7.25% | 6.80% | 7.66% | 6.03% | 6.77% | 6.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDGDX and HFQAX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDGDX has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to HFQAX (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGDX dropped -38.44% vs HFQAX's -52.77%.
HFQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDGDX and HFQAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer