FDG vs. VXUS
FDG (American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds. FDG is actively managed, while VXUS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDG returned 12.61%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for VXUS. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDG charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
FDG vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDG achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 14.25% return.
FDG
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 31.12%
- 3Y*
- 29.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 14.25%
- 6M
- 16.92%
- 1Y
- 32.01%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
FDG vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 7.52% | 22.13% | 45.89% | 37.22% | -35.74% | 8.52% | 93.61% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 14.25% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 48.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDG and VXUS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2020 | 0.66 |
The correlation between FDG and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDG vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDG
VXUS
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
FDG
VXUS
Communication Services
FDG
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
FDG
VXUS
Healthcare
FDG
VXUS
Industrials
FDG
VXUS
Financial Services
FDG
VXUS
Energy
FDG
VXUS
Utilities
FDG
VXUS
Basic Materials
FDG
-
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
FDG
-
VXUS
Real Estate
FDG
-
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDG vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
FDG
VXUS
FDG vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDG | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.76 | 2.12 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.37 | 2.90 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.39 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 2.85 | -0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.02 | 11.14 | -4.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDG | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 2.12 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.53 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.39 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
FDG vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDG drawdown since its inception was -43.69%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDG and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDG | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.69% | -35.97% | -7.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.71% | -11.27% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.14% | -13.58% | -12.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.69% | -29.44% | -14.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.13% | -0.99% | -2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.43% | -8.22% | -5.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 2.88% | +1.57% |
Volatility
FDG vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) is 5.18%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that FDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDG | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.18% | 5.60% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.03% | 13.00% | +1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.77% | 15.21% | +2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 16.05% | +8.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.90% | 17.16% | +7.74% |
FDG vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDG vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.66% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDG and VXUS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to FDG (5.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDG dropped -43.69% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 5-year performance, FDG leads with 12.61% vs 8.46% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, FDG has been the lower-risk option at 5.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDG has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDG.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.00% for FDG.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDG and 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDG and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer