FDG vs. RZG
Compare and contrast key facts about American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG).
FDG and RZG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDG is an actively managed fund by American Century. It was launched on Mar 31, 2020. RZG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Growth. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006.
Performance
FDG vs. RZG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDG vs. RZG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | -10.09% | 22.13% | 45.89% | 37.22% | -35.74% | 8.52% | 93.61% |
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF | 4.96% | 10.22% | 9.84% | 19.15% | -29.00% | 21.01% | 96.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDG achieves a -10.09% return, which is significantly lower than RZG's 4.96% return.
FDG
- 1D
- 4.35%
- 1M
- -4.42%
- YTD
- -10.09%
- 6M
- -5.30%
- 1Y
- 25.52%
- 3Y*
- 24.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.73%
- 10Y*
- —
RZG
- 1D
- 4.17%
- 1M
- -3.28%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- 22.42%
- 3Y*
- 14.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- 8.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDG vs. RZG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than RZG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDG vs. RZG — Risk / Return Rank
FDG
RZG
FDG vs. RZG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDG | RZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 0.99 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 1.55 | +0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 1.77 | -0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.57 | 7.39 | -1.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDG | RZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 0.99 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.10 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.35 | +0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDG and RZG is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FDG vs. RZG - Dividend Comparison
FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RZG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.37% | 0.95% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 0.22% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.46% | 0.44% | 0.65% | 0.70% |
Drawdowns
FDG vs. RZG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDG drawdown since its inception was -43.69%, smaller than the maximum RZG drawdown of -58.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDG and RZG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDG | RZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.69% | -58.52% | +14.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.71% | -13.42% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.69% | -38.33% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.04% | -4.71% | -7.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.75% | -12.22% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 3.21% | +1.24% |
Volatility
FDG vs. RZG - Volatility Comparison
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) have volatilities of 7.98% and 8.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDG | RZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.98% | 8.31% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 14.04% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.85% | 22.70% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.68% | 23.09% | +1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.05% | 24.62% | +0.43% |