FDG vs. FIXT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDG (American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF) and FIXT (Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF) are both Global Equities funds. FDG is actively managed, while FIXT is passively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDG charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FIXT.

Performance

FDG vs. FIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDG achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly higher than FIXT's 0.23% return.

FDG

• 1D: -2.00%
• 1M: 3.68%
• YTD: 7.52%
• 6M: 9.17%
• 1Y: 31.12%
• 3Y*: 29.27%
• 5Y*: 12.61%
• 10Y*: —

FIXT

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.23%
• 6M: 0.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDG vs. FIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	7.52%	21.19%
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	0.23%	4.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FDG and FIXT is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025	0.22

FDG vs. FIXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDG	FIXT
Technology	37.7%	-
Communication Services	21.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	17.1%	-
Healthcare	13.2%	100.0%
Industrials	5.2%	-
Financial Services	4.7%	-
Energy	0.6%	-
Utilities	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

FDG vs. FIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDG

FDG Risk / Return Rank: 46
FDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
FDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FDG Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FDG Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDG vs. FIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDG	FIXT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.99	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.02	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDG	FIXT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	1.34	-0.42

Drawdowns

FDG vs. FIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDG drawdown since its inception was -43.69%, which is greater than FIXT's maximum drawdown of -3.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDG and FIXT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDG	FIXT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.69%	-3.02%	-40.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.13%	-1.88%	-1.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.43%	-0.71%	-12.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.45%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDG	FIXT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.18%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.03%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.77%	3.77%	+14.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.67%	3.77%	+20.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.90%	3.77%	+21.13%

FDG vs. FIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FIXT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDG vs. FIXT - Dividend Comparison

FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	5.55%	3.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDG and FIXT in my portfolio?

FDG and FIXT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FDG or FIXT?

On fees, FDG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDG or FIXT?

FDG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDG or FIXT?

FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.55%, compared with 0.00% for FDG.

What is the main difference between FDG and FIXT?

They also come from different issuers: American Century and Procure. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDG and 0.75% for FIXT.