FDFF vs. XLFI

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FDFF (Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF) and XLFI (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDFF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while XLFI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FDFF returned -1.80% vs 12.57% for XLFI. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FDFF charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLFI.

Performance

FDFF vs. XLFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDFF achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly lower than XLFI's 4.34% return.

FDFF

• 1D: 1.66%
• 1M: 5.14%
• 6M: 3.96%
• YTD: 2.08%
• 1Y: -1.80%
• 3Y*: 11.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.28%

XLFI

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 3.25%
• 6M: 5.06%
• YTD: 4.34%
• 1Y: 12.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF	$136.84K	$154.95K	$132.20K
XLFI State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	$182.20K	$220.07K	$173.47K

FDFF vs. XLFI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF	2.08%	-6.96%
XLFI State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	4.34%	5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FDFF and XLFI is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.78

The correlation between FDFF and XLFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDFF vs. XLFI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDFF	XLFI
Financial Services	75.7%	100.4%
Technology	18.5%	-
Industrials	4.1%	-
Real Estate	0.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FDFF vs. XLFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDFF

FDFF Risk / Return Rank: 9
FDFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FDFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FDFF Omega Ratio Rank: 9
FDFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FDFF Martin Ratio Rank: 10

XLFI

XLFI Risk / Return Rank: 35
XLFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
XLFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
XLFI Omega Ratio Rank: 38
XLFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
XLFI Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDFF vs. XLFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDFF	XLFI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.10	1.07	-1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.01	1.45	-1.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.20	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.09	1.06	-1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.18	2.98	-3.16

FDFF vs. XLFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDFF Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the XLFI Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDFF and XLFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDFF vs. XLFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDFF drawdown since its inception was -23.06%, which is greater than XLFI's maximum drawdown of -11.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDFF and XLFI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDFF	XLFI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.06%	-11.89%	-11.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.60%	-11.89%	-8.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.30%	0.00%	-7.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.66%	-3.01%	-3.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.26%	4.22%	+6.04%

Volatility

FDFF vs. XLFI - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLFI) at 2.84%. This indicates that FDFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDFF	XLFI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.86%	2.84%	+2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.88%	9.14%	+5.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.62%	11.82%	+6.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.95%	11.88%	+7.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.95%	11.88%	+7.07%

FDFF vs. XLFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDFF has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLFI's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDFF vs. XLFI - Dividend Comparison

FDFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than XLFI's 12.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF	0.97%	0.86%	0.70%	0.27%
XLFI State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	12.13%	5.57%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDFF and XLFI in my portfolio?

FDFF and XLFI have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDFF or XLFI?

FDFF has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to XLFI (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDFF dropped -23.06% vs XLFI's -11.89%.

Which ETF is better, FDFF or XLFI?

On 1-year performance, XLFI leads with 12.57% vs -1.80% for FDFF. On fees, XLFI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XLFI has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDFF or XLFI?

Over the 1-year period, XLFI has performed better with a 12.57% return vs -1.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDFF or XLFI?

XLFI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDFF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDFF or XLFI?

XLFI has the higher dividend yield at 12.13%, compared with 0.97% for FDFF.

What is the main difference between FDFF and XLFI?

FDFF is categorized as Financials Equities, while XLFI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDFF and 0.35% for XLFI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.