FDFF vs. TRUF
FDFF (Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF) and TRUF (VanEck Financials TruSector ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDFF charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUF.
Performance
FDFF vs. TRUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FDFF
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 6.98%
- 6M
- -4.05%
- YTD
- -1.88%
- 1Y
- -7.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRUF
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDFF vs. TRUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF | 11.70% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 14.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDFF and TRUF is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDFF vs. TRUF — Risk / Return Rank
FDFF
TRUF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDFF vs. TRUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) and VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDFF | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.64 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDFF vs. TRUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDFF drawdown since its inception was -23.06%, which is greater than TRUF's maximum drawdown of -3.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDFF and TRUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDFF | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.06% | -3.24% | -19.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.89% | -0.15% | -10.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.60% | -1.12% | -5.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.77% | — | — |
Volatility
FDFF vs. TRUF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDFF | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.59% | 13.94% | +4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 13.94% | +5.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 13.94% | +5.04% |
FDFF vs. TRUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDFF has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUF's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDFF vs. TRUF - Dividend Comparison
FDFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than TRUF's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF | 1.01% | 0.86% | 0.70% | 0.27% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDFF and TRUF have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDFF.
FDFF has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.36% for TRUF.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDFF and 0.10% for TRUF.
Find the right allocation for FDFF and TRUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer