FDFF vs. TRUF
FDFF (Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF) and TRUF (VanEck Financials TruSector ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FDFF charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUF.
Performance
FDFF vs. TRUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FDFF
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- -1.80%
- 3Y*
- 11.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.28%
TRUF
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $136.84K | $154.95K | $132.20K | |
| $21.67K | $19.26K | $11.60K |
FDFF vs. TRUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF | 16.20% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 17.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDFF and TRUF is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDFF vs. TRUF — Risk / Return Rank
FDFF
TRUF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDFF vs. TRUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) and VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDFF | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.18 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDFF vs. TRUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDFF drawdown since its inception was -23.06%, which is greater than TRUF's maximum drawdown of -3.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDFF and TRUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDFF | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.06% | -3.24% | -19.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.30% | -0.39% | -6.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.66% | -1.04% | -5.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.26% | — | — |
Volatility
FDFF vs. TRUF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDFF | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.88% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.62% | 13.48% | +5.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 13.48% | +5.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 13.48% | +5.47% |
FDFF vs. TRUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDFF has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUF's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDFF vs. TRUF - Dividend Comparison
FDFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than TRUF's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF | 0.97% | 0.86% | 0.70% | 0.27% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDFF and TRUF have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDFF.
FDFF has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.35% for TRUF.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDFF and 0.10% for TRUF.
Find the right allocation for FDFF and TRUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer