FDFF vs. KRE
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) and SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE).
FDFF and KRE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDFF is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 16, 2020. KRE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index. It was launched on Jun 19, 2006.
Performance
FDFF vs. KRE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDFF vs. KRE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF | -12.07% | -2.75% | 27.86% | 15.99% |
KRE SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF | 1.11% | 10.21% | 18.58% | 24.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDFF achieves a -12.07% return, which is significantly lower than KRE's 1.11% return.
FDFF
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- YTD
- -12.07%
- 6M
- -13.30%
- 1Y
- -9.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KRE
- 1D
- 2.42%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 4.17%
- 1Y
- 17.51%
- 3Y*
- 17.48%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDFF vs. KRE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDFF has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than KRE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDFF vs. KRE — Risk / Return Rank
FDFF
KRE
FDFF vs. KRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) and SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDFF | KRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | 0.63 | -1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | 1.00 | -1.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.15 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 1.23 | -1.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 3.07 | -4.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDFF | KRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 | 0.63 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.12 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDFF and KRE is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FDFF vs. KRE - Dividend Comparison
FDFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than KRE's 2.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF | 1.03% | 0.86% | 0.70% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KRE SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF | 2.42% | 2.45% | 2.59% | 2.99% | 2.51% | 1.97% | 2.78% | 2.21% | 2.48% | 1.40% | 1.40% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
FDFF vs. KRE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDFF drawdown since its inception was -23.06%, smaller than the maximum KRE drawdown of -68.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDFF and KRE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDFF | KRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.06% | -68.54% | +45.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.31% | -14.95% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -52.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.14% | -11.00% | -9.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.77% | -22.05% | +16.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.19% | 6.00% | +3.19% |
Volatility
FDFF vs. KRE - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) at 5.28%. This indicates that FDFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDFF | KRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 5.28% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.20% | 17.94% | -3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.46% | 28.13% | -5.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 30.07% | -11.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 31.96% | -12.92% |