FDFF vs. GABF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF).

FDFF and GABF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDFF is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 16, 2020. GABF is an actively managed fund by Gabelli. It was launched on May 9, 2022.

Performance

FDFF vs. GABF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FDFF vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF	-12.07%	-2.75%	27.86%	15.99%
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	-9.92%	3.60%	44.38%	23.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDFF achieves a -12.07% return, which is significantly lower than GABF's -9.92% return.

FDFF

• 1D: 2.62%
• 1M: -4.44%
• YTD: -12.07%
• 6M: -13.30%
• 1Y: -9.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GABF

• 1D: 2.41%
• 1M: -3.92%
• YTD: -9.92%
• 6M: -12.00%
• 1Y: -3.40%
• 3Y*: 20.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDFF vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDFF has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.

FDFF

Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF

GABF

Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF

Return for Risk

FDFF vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDFF

FDFF Risk / Return Rank: 4
FDFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
FDFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FDFF Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FDFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
FDFF Martin Ratio Rank: 4

GABF

GABF Risk / Return Rank: 9
GABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
GABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
GABF Omega Ratio Rank: 9
GABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
GABF Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDFF vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDFF	GABF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	-0.15	-0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.47	-0.05	-0.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	0.99	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.43	-0.18	-0.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.05	-0.47	-0.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDFF vs. GABF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDFF Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the GABF Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDFF and GABF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDFF	GABF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.43	-0.15	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.86	-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between FDFF and GABF is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FDFF vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison

FDFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than GABF's 2.18% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF	1.03%	0.86%	0.70%	0.27%	0.00%
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	2.18%	1.96%	4.19%	4.95%	1.31%

Drawdowns

FDFF vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDFF drawdown since its inception was -23.06%, which is greater than GABF's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDFF and GABF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDFF	GABF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.06%	-20.86%	-2.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.31%	-17.16%	-5.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.14%	-14.35%	-5.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.77%	-4.63%	-1.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.19%	6.43%	+2.76%

Volatility

FDFF vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) have volatilities of 6.00% and 5.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDFF	GABF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.00%	5.73%	+0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.20%	13.63%	+0.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.46%	22.80%	-0.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.04%	20.70%	-1.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.04%	20.70%	-1.66%